Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Felvis Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$161kEducation$114kArts & Culture$86kHealth$36kReligion$13kRecreation & Sports$11kAnimals$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST AGNES ACADEMY$10,000
ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH$8,000
HOUSTON BOTANIC GARDEN$6,500
ST MICHAELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
CHAPELWOOD SCOUT FOUNDATION$2,000
TREES FOR HOUSTON$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RAISEUP FAMILIES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$372k · 13 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$372k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

62%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsInternationalMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    Trees For Houston
    8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +133%
  • LA
    Lawndale Art & Performance Center
    6× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +75%
  • BF
    BLACK FRET DBA SONIC GUILD
    5× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • LL
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • HP
    Houston Parks Boardgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue +25%
  • BB
    Buffalo Bayou Partnership Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +185%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
2
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
3
The Houston Parks Board Foundation

The Houston Parks Board Foundation provides the Houston Parks Board with financial assistance to support operations and park projects.

Environment
4
Houston Arts Alliance

See Schedule OHouston Arts Alliance (HAA) is a local arts and culture organization whose principal work is implementing the City of Houston's vision, values, and goals for its arts grantmaking and civic art investments. HAA conducts work…

Arts & Culture
5
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
6
Rebuilding Together Houston

Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…

Housing & Shelter
7
Hermann Park Conservancy

Hermann Park Conservancy is a citizens organization dedicated to the stewardship and improvement of Hermann Park - today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
9
Willow Waterhole Greenspace Conservancy

The Willow Waterhole Greenspace Conservancy ("Willow Waterhole") serves as the leading advocate for public greenspace improvements and nature preservation at the 291-acre Willow Waterhole Greenway. (See Schedule O)Willow Waterhole partners…

Environment
10
Bexar Land Trust Inc dba Green Spaces Alliance of South Texas

The mission of Bexar Land Trust (Green Spaces) is to sustain the natural environment and enhance urban spaces through land conservation, community engagement, and education.

Environment
11
Houston Area Parkinson Society

The mission of the Houston Area Parkinson Society is to use a whole-human approach to community building, which reduces the fear and isolation associated with a Parkinson's diagnosis.

12
Houston Bar Foundation

The Houston Bar Foundation supports programs that help provide legal representation to the indigent, promote community understanding of our legal system, and foster the administration of justice.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scenic Houston Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eddie Burke Sr Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDog and Cat RescueTexas Environmental AdvocacyYouth & Community Fundraisi…Youth Sports Training ClubsHomeless Services & SupportPerforming Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%5%<5yr15%14%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr15%3%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr12%86%35–55yr12%3%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
15%
7,197/48,820

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Trees For Houston — $149,500 · OtherTrees For HoustonTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $51,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINST MICHAELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $42,500 · OtherST MICHAELS CATHOLIC SCHOOLST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH — $33,000 · OtherST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCHLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC — $28,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC+8 more — $25,050 · Other+8 moreLawndale Art & Performance Center — $52,500 · Arts & CultureLawndale Art & Per…BLACK FRET DBA SONIC GUILD — $10,700 · Arts & CultureBLACK FRET DBA SON…Open Dance Project Inc — $3,700 · Arts & CultureBo's Place — $3,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $4,500 · Arts & Culture+3 moreHouston Botanic Garden — $9,250 · EnvironmentBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc — $4,800 · EnvironmentKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentSCENIC HOUSTON INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentHouston Parks Board — $9,400 · PhilanthropyBella's Buddies Inc — $4,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $3,000 · AnimalsHouston Zoo Inc — $1,100 · AnimalsTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · HealthAUSTIN TEXAS ROLLERGIRLS INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsEDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,550 · Recreation & Sports
Other$329,050Arts & Culture$74,400Environment$17,050Philanthropy$9,400Animals$8,100Health$5,500Recreation & Sports$3,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrees For Houston — $149,500 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetLawndale Art & Performance Center — $52,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetBLACK FRET DBA SONIC GUILD — $10,700 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Parks Board — $9,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Botanic Garden — $9,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRETREET — $6,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc — $4,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBella's Buddies Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOpen Dance Project Inc — $3,700 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBo's Place — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN A NEW GROOVE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBIG MEDIUM — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN TEXAS ROLLERGIRLS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetA Chance to Rock — $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAISEUP FAMILIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGALVESTON ARTS CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCENIC HOUSTON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Jesuits International Inc — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX20.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Strake Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Better Business Bureau · I Live Here I Give Here · Hobby Family Foundation · John P McGovern Foundation · Harris & Eliza Kempner Fund Inc · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Felvis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Felvis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Felvis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph