Skip to content
Feigenbaum Family Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Feigenbaum Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$265k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$933kHuman Services$354kHealth$162kPhilanthropy$31kEducation$28kRecreation & Sports$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$113k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$50,000
TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS$40,000
VARIOUS CHARITIABLE GRANTS$34,244
Individual grant recipient$23,600
THE CHEVRA GMACH$20,000
AL KANFEI NESHARIM$17,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,800
ACHIEZER$10,000
BEIS MEDRASH MAYAN HATORAH$10,000
SAMCHEINU$7,500
CHASDEI LEV$7,500
YESHIVA GEDOLA OF CARTERET$6,000
YESHIVA GEDOLA TIFERES TZVI$6,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF ROCKAWAYS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $344k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHEI4EVER: $46k → 11%CHEI4EVER: $15k → 11%CHEI4EVER: $15k → 11%ACHIEZER: $16k → 6%ACHIEZER: $13k → 6%ACHIEZER: $10k → 6%ACHIEZER: $10k → 6%ACHIEZER: $8k → 6%CHEI4EVER: $8k → 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $6k → 6%MISASKIM: $30k → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 6%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 6%MISASKIM: $250 → 20%THE CHEVRA GMACH: $25k → 6%THE CHEVRA GMACH: $23k → 6%THE CHEVRA GMACH: $20k → 6%THE CHEVRA GMACH: $20k → 6%THE CHEVRA GMACH: $20k → 6%AL KANFEI NESHARIM: $18k → 6%AL KANFEI NESHARIM: $10k → 6%AL KANFEI NESHARIM: $10k → 6%AL KANFEI NESHARIM: $10k → 6%AL KANFEI NESHARIM: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 27 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
8

Total granted

$1.6M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+59%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHEVRA GEMACH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $108k · revenue +105%
  • AC
    ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $56k · revenue +16%
  • AK
    AL KANFEI NISHARIM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +252%

Funded once

  • ZC
    ZVARIOUS CHARITIABLE GRANTS
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • YK
    YESHIVA KOL TORAH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • H
    HATZALAH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
4
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
5
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
6
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
7
American Friends of Chasdei Lev

To provide clothing and food, distribute funds and pay third-party bills to and for the benefit of needy individuals and families, in a dignified manner, through chasdei lev.

Religion
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
10
Friends of Bikur Cholim Ezrat Achim

To support the charitable activities of the organization ezrat achim in the city of beit shemesh, israel.

International
11
Nefesh Chaim Inc
Religion
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Misaskim Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $260,500 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAHTORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS: $240,350 · OtherTORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLSIndividual grant recipient: $131,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS CHARITIABLE GRANTS: $97,458 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIABLE GRANTSIndividual grant recipient: $83,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $65,200 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH MAYAN HATORAH: $50,000 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC: $49,500 · Other+14 more: $274,193 · Other+14 moreTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $108,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INCCHAI 4EVER INC: $83,500 · Human ServicesCHAI 4EVER INCACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $55,500 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESO…AL KANFEI NISHARIM INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesAL KANFEI NISHARIM INCMISASKIM CORP: $31,250 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP+1 more: $11,000 · Human ServicesKEREN ZICHRON ARYEH LEIB: $30,000 · ReligionSAMCHAINU INC: $10,220 · ReligionYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $3,600 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $7,650 · PhilanthropyMEKIMI: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $360 · Health
Other$1,252,301Human Services$344,250Religion$43,820Philanthropy$27,650Health$20,360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $108,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $83,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $55,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAL KANFEI NISHARIM INC: $55,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH MAYAN HATORAH: $50,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $31,250 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetKEREN ZICHRON ARYEH LEIB: $30,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetMEKIMI: $20,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMCHAINU INC: $10,220 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $7,650 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHEVRA GEMACH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI 4EVER INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AL KANFEI NISHARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MEDRASH MAYAN HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds KEREN ZICHRON ARYEH LEIB ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEKIMI ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMCHAINU INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundThe Ganger Foundation…Zichron Yechiel Meche…Astar Foundation IncThe Zev and Susan Mun…Alyad Foundation IncBelsky Family Foundat…The Arthur & Joyce Fe…Jsw FoundationAllen I Gross Charita…Murray & Sydell Rosen…
The Ojc FundNY31.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ganger Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Astar Foundation Inc · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · Belsky Family Foundation Inc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jsw Foundation · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Murray & Sydell Rosenberg Foundationinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Feigenbaum Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Feigenbaum Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Feigenbaum Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Feigenbaum Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Feigenbaum Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home