Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fcm Cares Inc

Fcm cares: empowering kindness to our communities through acts of service and charity.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$195kEducation$141kHousing & Shelter$91kHealth$88kYouth Development$40kPhilanthropy$39kEmployment$38kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$8,745
Median grant
4
States reached
$225k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTHER GRANTS NOT EXCEEDING 5000$100,604
MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE$10,000
CHRISTMAS FOR THE CHILDREN$10,000
WE LOVE BIRTHDAY PARTIES$9,500
MT JULIET HELP CENTER$8,745
SPECIAL KIDS$7,550
TN COLLEGE OF APPLIED TECHNOLOGY -$7,500
THE MTSU FOUNDATION-VETERAN ENRICHM$7,500
ADVANCE CAMP$6,110
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AUTISM CARES FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%TALLAPOOSA COUNTY GIRLS RANCH: $8k → 18%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $13k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $10k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $10k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$673k · 12 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$673k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-16%

Still filing today

75%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR THE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF TENNESSEE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +335%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +14%
  • NASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $41k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • SC
    SIMPLY CHOSEN
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • HH
    Humphreys Homeless Coalition
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $14k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
2
Tennessee Kids Belong Inc

Tennessee Kids Belong dramatically improves the experiences and outcomes for children in foster care.

Human Services
3
Helping Hounds Find Homesinc

Saving the lives of homeless and unwanted pets in harrison county kentucky and surrounding areas.

Animals
4
Habitat for Humanity Williamson -Maury

Habitat for humanity of williamson-maury (hfhwm) seeks to put god's love into action by partnering with communites to build affordable housing, inspiring hope and life-changing stability for families through homeownership.

5
Michael Dunn Center

To empower individuals living with disabilities and challenges to gain independence

Human Services
6
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
7
Mur-Ci Homes Inc

To improve the quality of life for individuals with severe/profound disabilities by assisting them through high-quality 24 hour, 7 days a week continuous care.

Human Services
8
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Knoxville Tn Inc

We offer temporary lodging for families having critically ill children. See page Part III for more information.

Health
9
Welcome House Knoxville

Our Mission at Welcome House Knoxville is to share the love of Jesus through the ministries of hospitality and friendship. We provide safe and loving homes for individuals and families in transition to permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter
10
Tennessee Family Solutions Inc

Residential and support services to children and adults with severe and multiple disabilities allowing them the opportunity to lead safe, stable, and personally fulfilling lifestyles in tennessee communities.

Health
11
Humane Society of the Tennessee Valley Inc

Humane society of the tennessee valley, inc. is dedicated to providing lifesaving programs and resources to enrich the lives of people and companion animals in the communities we serve.

Animals
12
Habitat for Humanity Pennyrile Region Inc

To provide affordable housing and financing to low income families.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Middle Tennessee and the most unlike its peers is Advance Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceAffordable Housing Developm…Child and Family ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and AdoptionVeteran Support ServicesPublic University Foundatio…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%15%<5yr14%10%5–10yr17%15%10–20yr13%25%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr24%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%7%<5yr14%18%5–10yr17%6%10–20yr13%27%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr24%25%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
4,628/36,374

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
8/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRISTMAS FOR THE CHILDREN — $150,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS FOR THE CHILDRENOTHER GRANTS NOT EXCEEDING 5000 — $111,884 · OtherOTHER GRANTS NOT EXCEEDING 5000SIMPLY CHOSEN — $24,765 · OtherSIMPLY CHOSENIndividual grant recipient — $14,086 · OtherWE LOVE BIRTHDAY PARTIES — $21,533 · OtherWE LOVE BIRTHDAY PARTIES+9 more — $73,923 · Other+9 moreMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $111,384 · EducationMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE …THE FOUNDATION FOR THE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF TENNESSEE — $67,500 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE …NASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC — $40,823 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE SA…RUTHERFORD COUNTY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,068 · Housing & ShelterRUTHERFORD C…Humphreys Homeless Coalition — $16,372 · Housing & ShelterHumphreys Ho…NEW HORIZONS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SUMTER COUNTY AREA — $8,638 · Housing & ShelterNEW HORIZONS…Ronald McDonald House Global — $33,280 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN — $10,000 · HealthSPECIAL KIDS INC — $7,550 · HealthAUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $6,270 · HealthHICKS STRONG INC — $5,400 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE — $42,991 · Human ServicesAUTISM CARES FOUNDATION — $10,140 · Human ServicesALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC — $8,090 · Human ServicesHope For The Warriors — $31,847 · PhilanthropyCHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC — $6,800 · PhilanthropyMT JULIET HELP CENTER — $24,490 · Community Improvement
Other$396,191Education$178,884Housing & Shelter$90,901Health$62,500Human Services$61,221Philanthropy$38,647Community Improvement$24,490

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $111,384 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF TENNESSEE — $67,500 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE — $42,991 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC — $40,823 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global — $33,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors — $31,847 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRUTHERFORD COUNTY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,068 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMT JULIET HELP CENTER — $24,490 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWE LOVE BIRTHDAY PARTIES — $21,533 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetHumphreys Homeless Coalition — $16,372 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetAUTISM CARES FOUNDATION — $10,140 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SUMTER COUNTY AREA — $8,638 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust — $8,355 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC — $8,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC — $7,550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC — $6,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORKING DOGS FOR VETS — $5,816 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHICKS STRONG INC — $5,400 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN24.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Nashville Predators Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fcm Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph