Skip to content

· Public charity

Father Flanagan's Boys' Home

Changing the way America cares for children and families.

$25M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$170MYouth Development$1.1M
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $18,623,056, the rows itemized in this filing. The $24,945,343 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,322,287 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,625,075
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys Town South Florida Inc$3,892,190
Boys Town Louisiana Inc$3,526,077
Boys Town Central Florida Inc$3,274,533
Boys Town North Florida Inc$2,625,075
Boys Town New England Inc$2,604,786
Boys Town Nevada Inc$1,788,263
Boys Town Washington DC Inc$912,132
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $137.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Boys Town California Inc: $6.1M → 12%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $2.7M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.7M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $3.6M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $3.5M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $5.2M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $4.2M → 23%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $2.7M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.4M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.8M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $3.2M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $3.1M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $3.7M → 23%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $2.6M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.3M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.8M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $3.2M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $2.5M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $3.5M → 23%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $912k → 12%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $2.6M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.3M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.8M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $2.9M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $2.3M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $3.0M → 23%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $2.5M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.2M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.6M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $2.8M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $2.0M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $2.9M → 23%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $2.5M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.1M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.4M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $2.6M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $1.8M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $2.8M → 23%Boys Town Washington DC Inc: $1.5M → 14%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $3.0M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.4M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $2.4M → 7%Boys Town Nevada Inc: $1.7M → 13%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $2.8M → 23%Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $2.2M → 11%Boys Town North Florida Inc: $2.0M → 19%Boys Town New England Inc: $1.9M → 7%Boys Town Louisiana Inc: $2.1M → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$170M · 9 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$170M
$1.1M

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    Boys Town South Florida Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $27M · revenue +10% · 46% of their budget
  • BT
    Boys Town Central Florida Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25M · revenue +22% · 56% of their budget
  • BT
    Boys Town Louisiana Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25M · revenue +20% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • BT
    Boys Town Texas Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $1.1M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Father Flanagan's Boys' Home

Changing the way America cares for children and families.

Human Services
2
Nebraska Families Collaborative

PromiseShip tirelessly spans boundaries bringing powerful partners together to provide innovative solutions that transform lifes uncertainties into family wellbeing.

—
3
Boys Town National Alumni Assocation

We the former citizens of Boys Town Nebraska. Desiring to keep alive among the alumni the bonds of friendship formed at Boys Town. To promote the general good and welfare of Father Flanagans boys home by good work example and words.

Education
4
Bon Secours New York Health System Affiliated Group

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

—
5
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

—
6
St Francis Homes for Boys

Campus cottages, community group homes, Supported Independent Living (SIL) apartments, and specialized school for dependent children ages 10-21. Case management, behavioral therapy, residential supervision, recreational activities,…

—
7
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
8
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
9
Therapeutic Safe Haven Foundation

Support of residential services for homeless children

Human Services
10
James Barry Robinson Institute

The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.

Human Services
11
Family Support Network

Family support network recognized that children are the foundation of the future and that the family as a basic unit os society is the natural environment for the growth and development of all its members. family support network seeks to…

Education
12
Boys and Girls Home and Family Services Inc

Support for related entities

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys Town North Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys Town Washington Dc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys Town Central Florida Inc: $25,245,163 · Human ServicesBoys Town Central Florida IncBoys Town Louisiana Inc: $25,025,293 · Human ServicesBoys Town Louisiana IncBoys Town New England Inc: $22,577,860 · Human ServicesBoys Town New England IncBoys Town North Florida Inc: $21,503,781 · Human ServicesBoys Town North Florida IncBoys Town Nevada Inc: $18,682,240 · Human ServicesBoys Town Nevada IncBoys Town Washington DC Inc: $17,886,739 · Human ServicesBoys Town Washington DC IncBoys Town California Inc: $7,024,985 · Human ServicesBoys Town South Florida Inc: $27,392,040 · OtherBoys Town South Flori…Boys Town New York Inc: $4,273,942 · OtherBoys Town New York In…+1 more: $1,054,315 · Other
Human Services$137,946,061Other$32,720,297

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys Town South Florida Inc: $27,392,040 over 8y, 46% of budgetBoys Town Central Florida Inc: $25,245,163 over 8y, 56% of budgetBoys Town Louisiana Inc: $25,025,293 over 8y, 40% of budgetBoys Town New England Inc: $22,577,860 over 8y, 43% of budgetBoys Town North Florida Inc: $21,503,781 over 8y, 53% of budgetBoys Town Nevada Inc: $18,682,240 over 7y, 63% of budgetBoys Town Washington DC Inc: $17,886,739 over 8y, 67% of budgetBoys Town California Inc: $7,024,985 over 6y, 93% of budgetBoys Town New York Inc: $4,273,942 over 5y, 100% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys Town South Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town Central Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town Louisiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town New England Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town North Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town Nevada Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town Washington DC Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town California Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys Town New York Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Father Flanagan's Boys' Home funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Father Flanagan's Boys' Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph