Skip to content

· Public charity

Fantasy Cares

The mission of Fantasy Cares is to inspire people to bring a charitable element to their fantasy leagues and to help raise money each year through the fantasy sports community for various 501(c)(3) charities.

$291k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Philanthropy$146kHealth$20kHuman Services$8kHousing & Shelter$6kEducation$6k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $31,438, the rows itemized in this filing. The $291,183 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $259,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$7,550
Median grant
4
States reached
$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Network for Good$12,360
Children with Diabetes$7,550
Donorchoose org$5,907
Down Syndrome of Louisville Inc$5,621
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 19% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BEST CHRISTMAS EVER: $8k → 10%BREAK THE HOLD: $7k → 9%Donorchoose org: $6k → 17%Network for Good: $12k → 14%SARAH FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%Children with Diabetes: $8k → 12%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $123k → 7%Down Syndrome of Louisville Inc: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
CT
KY
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
3
National Christian Foundation Orlando Inc

To encourage and facilitate greater charitable giving by offering simple, innovative, and efficient giving tools to support charities, churches, and christian ministries.

Philanthropy
4
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
5
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
6
Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

At donor advised charitable giving, inc., our mission is to increase charitable giving in the united states by offering advantageous ways to give useful information and unbiased guidance.

Philanthropy
7
Children's Diabetes Foundation

To raise funds to support the barbara davis center for childhood diabetes, where thousands of patients of all ages from all over the world receive the finest diabetes care available.

Health
8
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
9
Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inc

To lead and mobilize resources toward effective management, treatment and ultimately a cure for myotonic dystrophy through education, advocacy and research.

Health
10
Ndsc Foundation Inc

The foundation provides support to the national down syndrome congress, a 501(c)(3) organization. the mission of the national down syndrome congress is to provide information, advocacy, and support concerning all aspects of life for…

Philanthropy
11
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
12
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Children With Diabetes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $122,548 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONSARAH FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropySARAH FOUNDATION INCBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC: $8,000 · OtherBEST CHRISTM…BREAK THE HOLD INC: $7,010 · OtherBREAK THE HO…CITY HOUSE DELRAY: $6,000 · OtherCITY HOUSE D…THE CHILDREN WITH DIABETES FOUNDATION: $7,550 · HealthDown Syndrome of Louisville Inc: $5,621 · HealthNETWORK FOR GOOD: $12,360 · Public Safety & DisasterDONORSCHOOSEORG: $5,907 · Education
Philanthropy$133,548Other$21,010Health$13,171Public Safety & Disaster$12,360Education$5,907

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $122,548 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $12,360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $5,907 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDown Syndrome of Louisville Inc: $5,621 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fantasy Cares funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fantasy Cares. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fantasy Cares?

    Find your warmest path to Fantasy Cares through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fantasy Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph