· Private foundation
Faith Takes Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST SOPHIA'S GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $2,500 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST THEODOROA | $2,000 |
| ALBANY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $1,400 |
| THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue ×26
- TLTO LIFE INC4× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +29%
- CRCAPITAL ROOTS INC3× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- TWTHE WILDWOOD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -12%
- CLCABRINI LEGACY CORPORATIONone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -99%
- MHMUSIC HAVENone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide for education, scholarships and other charitable purposes related to the culinary profession
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.
It is the mission of carefirst ny, inc. to affirm life through extraordinary, compassionate support and care to patients and families in chemung, steuben and schuyler counties.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
We work to ensure that individuals with disabilities can live independently as equal members of society.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve
Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wildwood Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Haven of Hope Farm and Residence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALBANY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds CAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds TO LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILDWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds CABRINI LEGACY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEWORKS COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHD RECREATION CTR INC HOPE 7 COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ECCENTRIC CLUB OF GLOVERSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE FARM AND RESIDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Review Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Bbl Charitable Foundation · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Howard and Bush Foundation Inc · Massry Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeler Motor Car Company Charitable Foundation · The McCarthy Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Faith Takes Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.