Skip to content
Faith Regional Health Services at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Faith Regional Health Services

To serve christ by providing all people with exemplary medical services in an environment of love and care.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$675kHealth$175kEmployment$150kRecreation & Sports$125kCommunity Improvement$101kPhilanthropy$44kInternational$21kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $118,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $252,731 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $134,231 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$276M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA$105,000
FOR THE GIRLS NORFOLK$7,500
NORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $725k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KNIGHTS OF AKSARBEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $105k → 13%NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $105k → 13%NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $105k → 13%NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $105k → 13%NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $105k → 13%NORFOLK FAMILY YMCA: $100k → 13%NORTH FORK AREA TRANSIT: $50k → 13%NORFOLK AREA YMCA: $35k → 13%NORFOLK AREA YMCA: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORFOLK AREA YMCA ENDOWMENT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $665k · revenue +25% · 98% of their budget
  • FR
    FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $94k · revenue +8%
  • NC
    NORFOLK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $56k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • NF
    North Fork Area Transit Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -53%
  • NN
    Northern Nebraska Area Health Education Centergraduated
    5× · 2017–2021 · $27k · revenue +33% · 27% of their budget
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Norfolk Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation

Dedicated to charitable activities but not limited to community development activities for the betterment of norfolk ne and the surrounding areas.

Education
2
Nebraska Rural Health Association

The NeRHA is a non-profit, grassroots, member-driven organization interested in the health of rural Nebraskans throughout the state. The NeRHA membership works together to identify health concerns of rural Nebraska and find ways to improve…

Health
3
Nebraska Safety Council

Provide education and leadership to empower people to live safe and healthy.

—
4
Norfolk Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
5
Nebraska Hospitality Association

To promote the restaurant industry

—
6
The Greater Norwich Foundation
—
7
Northeast Kingdom Chamber of Commerce

To promote local tourism and business.

—
8
Northeast Business Group On Health Inc

Empowering our members to drive excellence and achieve the highest value in healthcare delivery and the consumer experience.

—
9
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
10
Nebraska Water Environment Assn

Professional educational organization committed to public education, training and providing leadership in water quality policy development.

Environment
11
Norad and Usnorthcom Enlisted Council
Public Benefit
12
Nebraska Diplomats Inc

The nebraska diplomats,inc. includes members and state leaders who use their rapport with business executives worldwide to promote investment and employment in nebraska.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norfolk Area United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rotary International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORFOLK AREA YMCA ENDOWMENT: $665,000 · Human ServicesNORFOLK AREA YMCA ENDOWMENTNorth Fork Area Transit Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesNorth Fork Area Transit Inc+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesNE NEBRASKA ALL STAR FOOTBALL: $120,000 · OtherNE NEBRASKA ALL STAR FOOTBALLGreater Norfolk Economic Development Foundation: $100,000 · OtherGreater Norfolk Economic Deve…NORFOLK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $56,217 · OtherNORFOLK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE4 LANES 4 NEBRASKA INC: $35,000 · Other4 LANES 4 NEBRASKA INCROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $16,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherFAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $93,500 · HealthFAITH REGIONAL …FOR THE GIRLS: $55,000 · HealthFOR THE GIRLSNorthern Nebraska Area Health Education Center: $26,700 · HealthNorthern Nebras…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthNORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $44,000 · PhilanthropyORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $5,000 · InternationalThe Zone Afterschool Program: $5,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$725,000Other$337,217Health$180,200Philanthropy$44,000International$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORFOLK AREA YMCA ENDOWMENT: $665,000 over 8y, 98% of budgetGreater Norfolk Economic Development Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetFAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $93,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNORFOLK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $56,217 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetFOR THE GIRLS: $55,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetNorth Fork Area Transit Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORFOLK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $44,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budget4 LANES 4 NEBRASKA INC: $35,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetNorthern Nebraska Area Health Education Center: $26,700 over 5y, 27% of budgetKNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nebraska Community Fo…Amazonsmile Foundation
Nebraska Community FoundationNE15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nebraska Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faith Regional Health Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faith Regional Health Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Faith Regional Health Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home