Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faith Home Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$909kHuman Services$488kReligion$50kCrime & Legal$30k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK MEMORY CENTER$45,000
EGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER$30,000
CARING KIND$30,000
MARYKNOLL SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC$25,000
THE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$25,000
VIBS$25,000
CHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGING$20,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELEN KELLER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+40%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $170k · revenue +0%
  • CH
    CHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGING
    7× · 2018–2024 · $119k · revenue +0%
  • EH
    EGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $118k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SO
    SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • HK
    Helen Keller Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
2
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
3
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Fund for the Aged Inc

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

Human Services
5
Village Center for Care

The center is funded primarily by patient service fees paid by medicaid, medicare and private insurance.

—
6
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
7
Amsterdam House Continuing Care Retirement Community Inc

Amsterdam house continuing care retirement community, inc.'s mission (ahccrc, inc.) was to establish, construct, own, operate and maintain a continuing care retirement community as defined in article 46 of the public health law of the…

—
8
Independent Living for Seniors Inc

To meet the health care needs of elderly persons and other individuals who require chronic health care by establishing and maintaining a chronic care management program, including but not limited to: management and coordination of…

Religion
9
Visiting Nurse Service Association Dba Visiting Nurse Services of Ne Ny

The mission of visiting nurse services of northeastern ny (vns) is to provide traditional and long term health care services, along with operating a new york state health home which provides home and community based population health…

Health
10
Cidny - Independent Living Services Inc

Home care services (under contract with various mco organizations)

Community Improvement
11
Kendal At Ithaca Inc

Our mission is to provide a mutually supportive environment for residents and staff, and to contribute to the greater ithaca community.

Human Services
12
Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center; the most unlike its peers is New York Memory Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK MEMORY CENTER INC: $250,000 · OtherNEW YORK MEMORY CENTER INCTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND: $170,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLANDVIBS: $100,000 · OtherVIBSCONCORD NURSING HOME INC: $100,000 · OtherCONCORD NURSING HOME INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $75,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $75,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORTHE CONCORD NURSING AND REHAB CENTER: $55,000 · OtherTHE CONCORD NURSING AND REHAB CENTERMARYKNOLL SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC INC: $50,000 · OtherDANISH HOME FOR THE AGED INC: $45,000 · Other+4 more: $104,000 · Other+4 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $170,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED D…CHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGING: $119,000 · HealthCHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGINGEGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $118,000 · HealthEGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATI…BROOKLYN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH HOME INC: $36,000 · HealthBROOKLYN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH …Helen Keller Services: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,024,000Health$443,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK MEMORY CENTER INC: $250,000 over 7y, 9.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $170,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND: $170,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetCHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGING: $119,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $118,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORD NURSING HOME INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDANISH HOME FOR THE AGED INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBROOKLYN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH HOME INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVICTIMS INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFFOLK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEGER LUTHERAN HOMES AND SERVICES INC: $29,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHelen Keller Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK MEMORY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND ↗
  • Who funds CHAPIN HOME FOR THE AGING ↗
  • Who funds EGER HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD NURSING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds DANISH HOME FOR THE AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTIMS INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFFOLK ↗
  • Who funds EGER LUTHERAN HOMES AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Helen Keller Services ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faith Home Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faith Home Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Faith Home Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Faith Home Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Faith Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph