Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fairman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$248kHealth$95kAnimals$60kReligion$53kPhilanthropy$36kYouth Development$14kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLIC$50,000
FOUNDATION FOR IUP$50,000
PUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$30,000
ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
BOB PERKS FUND$2,500
DUBOIS AREA UNITED WAY$1,500
GRADY'S DECISION$1,000
DUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLIC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%PUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 10 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$496k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+29%

Still filing today

40%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyScience & TechHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $151k · revenue -14%
  • PS
    PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $151k
  • PA
    PUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k

Funded once

  • DS
    DUBOIS SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • FM
    FREE MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • BF
    BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +149%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Pennsylvania Institute of Technology

The mission of pennsylvania institute of technology is student success. continued on schedule o.the college provides a supportive environment to enable committed students to succeed by offering the best collegiate education for career…

Education
3
Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit

Duquesne serves god by serving students-through commitment to excellence in liberal and professional education, through profound concern for moral and spiritual values, through the maintenance of an ecumenical atmosphere open to diversity,…

Education
4
Pittsburg State University Foundation Inc

To maximize private gift support for pittsburg state university, exercise proper management of foundation assets, lay the groundwork for future fundraising success in support of the university's teaching, research and service/civic…

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Johnstown Educational Foundation

The johnstown educational foundation mission is to receive, administer and distribute funds exclusively for the benefit and support of the university of pittsburgh at johnstown.

—
8
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
9
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
10
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
11
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
12
Iup Research Institute

To support the research activities of the indiana university of pa and partner instituitions in the pa state system of higher education.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Punxsutawney Area Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Grady's Decision. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $150,500 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYDUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLIC: $57,067 · OtherDUBOIS CENTRAL CATHOLICIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BOB PERKS FUND: $11,000 · Other+9 more: $15,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $151,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIV…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationPUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesPUNXSUTAWNEY…ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyDUBOIS AREA UNITED WAY: $10,500 · PhilanthropyGRADY'S DECISION: $5,000 · HealthBEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS CORPORATION: $2,500 · Science & TechWE CARE FOR KIDS: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$282,567Education$152,000Human Services$60,000Philanthropy$35,500Health$5,000Science & Tech$2,500Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $151,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetDUBOIS AREA UNITED WAY: $10,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGRADY'S DECISION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDuBois Educational Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP) ↗
  • Who funds PUNXSUTAWNEY AREA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds GRADY'S DECISION ↗
  • Who funds BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DuBois Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WE CARE FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS LITTLE LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fairman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fairman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fairman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fairman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fairman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph