Skip to content

· Public charity

Fair Share Inc

Fair share stands for an america where everyone gets their fair share, does their fair share, and pays their fair share; and where everyone plays by the same rules.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$307k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$776kCommunity Improvement$450kPublic Benefit$150k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $307k
$307,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fund for the Public Interest Inc$307,000
Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Fund for the Public Interest Inc: $307k → 16%Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation: $10k → 17%American Bridge 21st Century: $20k → 14%CHANGE CORPS INC: $140k → 12%Fund for the Public Interest Inc: $171k → 16%Every Eligible American: $10k → 14%Fair Share Action: $30k → 12%FAIR SHARE ACTION: $64k → 16%House Majority Forward: $450k → 14%PUBLIC INTEREST PAC: $15k → 12%MAJORITY FORWARD: $135k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Majority Forward

The organization's mission is to advocate for progressive policies and engaging in nonpartisan voter registration.

—
2
Democracy Forward

See schedule o.this organization seeks to build collective power to defend and advance a vibrant democracy that benefits all people.

—
3
Fair Democracy

Fair democracy works to ensure that the roots of american democracy are healthy with strong voting rights and access, an engaged and informed electorate, an open and accountable government and trusted messengers engaging americans in civil…

Civil Rights
4
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
5
Council for National Policy

To provide information about public policy and national policy alternatives to leaders in business, government, religion, and academia.

Public Benefit
6
The American Assembly

A national non partisan public policy forum to illuminate issues of public policy.

—
7
Issue One

Issue one is the leading crosspartisan political reform organization that educates the public, engages capitol hill, and advocates for solutions to fix our broken political system.

Public Benefit
8
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
9
Advance American Democracy Inc

To protect democracy by advocating for policies to strenghten democracy, educating the public about threats to our democracy, and highlighting the unpopularity of federal policies that places money and power over the rights and freedom of…

—
10
Just Foreign Policy

The organization is an independent and non-partisan membership organization dedicated to reforming u.s. foreign policy through coordinating the broad majority of americans to advocate their interests and values.

International
11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Change Corps; the most unlike its peers is Colorado Communications Network Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUND FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST INC: $477,801 · OtherFUND FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST INCCHANGE CORPS: $140,000 · OtherCHANGE CORPSMAJORITY FORWARD: $135,000 · OtherMAJORITY FORWARDFAIR SHARE ACTION: $93,547 · OtherFAIR SHARE ACTION+2 more: $40,000 · OtherHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $450,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARDAB FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public BenefitEVERY ELIGIBLE AMERICAN: $10,000 · Civil RightsBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health
Other$886,348Community Improvement$450,000Public Benefit$20,000Civil Rights$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUND FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST INC: $477,801 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $450,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCHANGE CORPS: $140,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetMAJORITY FORWARD: $135,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAB FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEVERY ELIGIBLE AMERICAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fair Share Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fair Share Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fair Share Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fair Share Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fair Share’s filings →

    More from the funding graph