Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fahringer Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Fahringer Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Fahringer Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $18k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’20
4
’21
4
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Philanthropy$636kAnimals$45kEducation$44kHuman Services$10kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Higher Achievement Program$2,500
Camping Unlimited$2,500
San Diego Food Bank$2,500
FeedingSanDiegoorg$2,000
Together Rising$1,500
Equal Justice Initiative$1,500
St Francis University$1,500
Cambrian Park Little League$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%St Francis University: $2k → 16%The Preuss School: $10k → 11%Humumya Foundation: $250 → 12%Camp Krem: $5k → 13%Rural Health Studies Trust: $5k → 16%Higher Achievement Program: $10k → 14%Equal Justice Initiative: $2k → 18%Ranaissance Charitable Foundation I: $636k → 16%Volunteer Hospice: $4k → 12%The Preuss School: $5k → 11%Humumya Foundation: $250 → 12%Camping Unlimited: $3k → 13%Higher Achievement Program: $5k → 14%San Diego Food Bank: $3k → 11%Higher Achievement Program: $3k → 14%FeedingSanDiegoorg: $2k → 11%Rancho Coastal Humane Society: $30k → 11%Turtleback Education Foundation: $10k → 11%Rancho Coastal Humane Society: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 5 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$88k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+8%

Still filing today

40%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
AnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCivil RightsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +89%
  • HA
    HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $18k · revenue +6%
  • TP
    The Preuss School
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k

Funded once

  • TE
    TURTLEBACK EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • RH
    RURAL HEALTH STUDIES TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -8% · 41% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
2
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
3
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
4
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Harrisburg University of Science and Technology

See schedule othe harrisburg university of science and technology offers innovative academic and research programs in science and technology that respond to local and global needs. the institution fosters a diverse community of learners,…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Alliant Educational Foundation

The alliant educational foundation builds bridges between under-resourced communities, universities, and other organizations to create a more equitable, healthy, and just society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Turtleback Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $635,954 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $17,500 · OtherThe Preuss School: $15,000 · OtherONE INCREDIBLE FAMILY INC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherCamping Unlimited: $2,500 · OtherFeedingSanDiegoorg: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $2,250 · OtherRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $45,000 · AnimalsRURAL HEALTH STUDIES TRUST: $5,000 · InternationalJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $2,500 · Food & NutritionEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,500 · Civil RightsSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Education
Philanthropy$645,954Other$57,750Animals$45,000International$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Civil Rights$1,500Education$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $635,954 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTURTLEBACK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetRURAL HEALTH STUDIES TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER RISING: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fahringer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fahringer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fahringer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fahringer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fahringer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph