Skip to content

· Private foundation

F Struben Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$79kHuman Services$12kEnvironment$8kEducation$7kReligion$6kArts & Culture$5kPhilanthropy$1kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$604k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MD$15,000
HARFORD LAND TRUST INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
VIRGINIA TECH BAPTIST COLLEGIATE MINISTRIES$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$2,500
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$500
NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS$500
HOPE CENTER OF MARYLAND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%New Life for Girls: $2k → 9%New Life for Girls: $2k → 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 11 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$106k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-47%

Still filing today

27%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Md St Joes Med Ctr
    3× · 2019–2021 · $24k
  • UO
    University of MD St Joe's Medical Center
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of MD School of Medicine
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM MILL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +38%
  • BC
    Baptist Collegiate Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harford Volunteer Fire Company

To provide fire protection, rescue and ambulance services to a community of approximately 4000 people.

—
2
Historical Society Harford Cou

Preserve the history of Harford County, Maryland

—
3
The Harford County Volunteer Fire and Ems Foundation Inc

To augment volunteer fire fighting and emergency medical services provided to harford county, maryland.

—
4
Harford County Volunteer Fire and Emergency Services Association Inc

To promote successful volunteer fire and emergency medical service operations within harford county, maryland.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Huntingtown Volunteer Fire Department

Fire, Rescue & Emergency Medical Services

Public Safety & Disaster
6
The Humane Society of Harford County Inc

The humane society of harford county's mission is to promote the humane treatment of homeless, stray and abandoned animals by providing shelter, care, adoptions and community education.

Animals
7
Howard County Medical Center Foundation

The purpose of the howard county medical center foundation shall be to preserve and enhance the services of howard county medical center.

Health
8
Hereford Volunteer Fire Company Inc

Volunteer fire fighting

Health
9
Halifax Fire Department

Providing fire protection to the surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
West Hempfield Fire and Rescue Company

Fire protection and rescue services.

—
11
Falling Spring Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Company

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Harford County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Jerusalem Mill Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Md St Joes Med Ctr: $24,000 · OtherUniversity of Md St Joes Med CtrUniversity of MD St Joe's Medical Center: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of MD St Joe's Medical CenterUNIVERSITY OF MD: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MDIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWomen's Care Center: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherUniversity of MD School of Medicine: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM MILL INC: $5,000 · OtherBaptist Collegiate Minst VT: $4,500 · Other+12 more: $13,125 · Other+12 moreUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $13,500 · HealthUpper Ches…HARFORD LAND TRUST INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentNEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARFORD COUNTY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC: $500 · Food & NutritionTHE HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Crime & LegalWhite Marsh Volunteer Fire Company: $200 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$122,125Health$13,500Environment$8,000Human Services$3,500Philanthropy$1,000Food & Nutrition$500Crime & Legal$250Public Safety & Disaster$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARFORD LAND TRUST INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM MILL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWhite Marsh Volunteer Fire Company: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARFORD LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM MILL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HARFORD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds White Marsh Volunteer Fire Company ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dresher Foundation IncMD17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dresher Foundation Inc · Kleins Shoprite of Maryland Charitable Fund Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization F Struben Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from F Struben Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Harford Land Trust Inc: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on F Struben’s filings →

More from the funding graph