· Private foundation
F A Schluter 1818 - 1882
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Excelsior Foundation | $68,500 |
| Jefferson Carnegie Library | $35,000 |
| Jefferson Museum | $19,000 |
| Historic Jefferson Foundation | $15,000 |
| Friends of the Arts | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Marion County Chamber of Commerce | $10,000 |
| Blessings of Grace-Marion Co Food P | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Marion County Toys for Tots | $2,000 |
| Corvette Club | $2,000 |
| Friends of Jefferson Library | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TEThe Excelsior Foundation5× · 2020–2025 · $199k · revenue +33%
- TJTHE JEFFERSONIAN INSTITUTE INC DBA CYPRESS VALLEY ALLIANCE3× · 2020–2022 · $63k · revenue +620% · 39% of their budget
- HJHistoric Jefferson Foundation2× · 2024–2025 · $28k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- JAJessie Allen Wise Garden Clubone grant, 2022 · $30k
- JDJefferson Diamond Youth BSAone grant, 2024 · $15k
- COCity of Jefferson Tourism Deptone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preserve history and heritage of jefferson texas and the operation of the jefferson museum
Fight fires and save lives
Promote awareness of preservation and renovation of historic buildings.
Saving the heritage of jefferson county,
Education and preservation of history.
To preserve, maintain and restore historical artifacts and information for future generations.
Preservation of histrical buildings
We provide assistance with economic development and tourism to jefferson county.
To preserve the history of marion county alabama
Collection and preservation of historical documents pertaining to saint charles county, missouri and making them available to the general public
Community and area fire protection. Render assistance at accident sites. Provide area ambulance service.
To strengthen and enhance economic development in marion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marion County Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Mims Volunteer Fire Department & Ambulance Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Excelsior Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE JEFFERSONIAN INSTITUTE INC DBA CYPRESS VALLEY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Marion County Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds Historic Jefferson Foundation ↗
- Who funds Krewe of Hebe Inc ↗
- Who funds MIMS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT & AMBULANCE SERVICE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DEPAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JEFFERSON ANIMALS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Big Cypress Corvettes
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization F A Schluter 1818 - 1882 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to F A Schluter 1818 - 1882?
Find your warmest path to F A Schluter 1818 - 1882 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.