· Private foundation
Ezer Giving
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Light 2 The World | $81,000 |
| Casa Sobre la Roca | $27,500 |
| Twin Cities Church | $15,000 |
| Central Missionary Clearinghouse | $13,481 |
| Came to Believe Recovery | $13,000 |
| Blazing Hope Ranch | $12,100 |
| Psalm 82 Initiative | $12,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,100 |
| Sierra Bible Church | $10,000 |
| Mukwonago Baptist Church | $8,745 |
| Baptist World Mission | $6,050 |
| Mount Hope Bible Camp | $6,050 |
| Greater European Mission | $770 |
| Ripe for Harvest | $440 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 32% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ezer Giving funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ezer Giving. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ezer Giving?
Find your warmest path to Ezer Giving through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Ezer Giving’s filings →