Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
Extrabases is a non-for-profit organization founded in 2000.
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of EXTRA BASES INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
24 hour shelter facility for abused children, including housing, food, psychologist, nurses, physical therapist, teachers, medical services, etc. for 20 children capacity in attendance.
The organization provides temporary shelter to abused children that have been removed from their homes by authorities.
Temporary emergency shelter 24hrs. 7 day a week for abused children from 1 to 4-year age. Victims have been removed from their homes by local Family Department. We provide all immediate needs for children such as food dress medicines labs…
Shelter for abuse children
Provide home for children from 10 months old to seven years old. provive all the necesary housing, food and clothing, taking them to school and doctors appointments and any required therapy.
Our mission is to help at-risk youth in the city of Tijuana, MX by supporting Casa Hogar La Gloria, an orphanage where children receive quality education, psychological attention, as well as a safe and secure environment in which to…
To provide music education for children and adolescents between 6 to 17 years old.
The company is engaged to provide physical occupational, speech and psychological therapy and treatment to handicapped adults and children
Offer orientation, assistance and lodging to women victims of domestic violence and the community.
Provides Daily Food, Academic Support, Psychological Attention and Comprehensive Care for Children at Risk Communities, In Order to Prevent School Dropout, Delincuency and Break the Poverty Cycle in their lives, through Education.
Healthy Ninos Honduras works for the health and wholeness of Honduran people, focusing on nutrition, wellness, hygiene, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hogar De Ninos Regazo De Paz I and the most unlike its peers is Ricky Martin Foundation Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondos Unidos de Puerto Rico Inc & United Way Puerto Rico · Puerto Rico Community Foundation Inc · Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Pga Tour Inc · Mark E Curry Family Foundation Inc · 2022 Act Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation EXTRA BASES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Casa Juan Bozco.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue held over 4 filed years.
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 660540316 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Casa Juan Bozco, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Extra Bases Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.