· Private foundation
Everhope Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIOLOGICAL MEDICAL INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND FARM INCUBATOR | $25,000 |
| OUR CHILDRENS TRUST | $25,000 |
| THE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD | $25,000 |
| SOCIAL ENTERPRISE GREENHOUSE | $25,000 |
| GORDON SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE MEDICINE | $10,000 |
| KARUNA FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| CLIMATE ACTION RI (CARI) | $10,000 |
| ECORI NEWS | $7,000 |
| FOOD 4 THOUGHT | $5,000 |
| MARION INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| GREEN ENERGY CONSUMERS ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.
21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SESOCIAL ENTERPRISE GREENHOUSE8× · 2017–2024 · $113k · revenue +123%
- TGTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +432%
Physicians Committee for Responsible Med7× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- CLCHOOSE LOVE INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -33%
- AFAI FOUNDATION FOR GIVING BACK FUNDone grant, 2022 · $25k
- EVEFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INCone grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +9%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.
We empower food service programs and school districts to make food delicious, nourishing, and responsible through our evidence-based certification program. We provide education and support that inspires students, schools, and communities…
Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.
The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
Planet reimagined is on a mission to deliver fair solutions for people and the planet.the organization is a creative climate incubator using an innovative action research method to test, refine, and scale solutions. we bring together…
Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.
How this is measured
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUR CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ENTERPRISE GREENHOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BIOLOGICAL MEDICINE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
- Who funds Karuna Foundation ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds The Gordon School ↗
- Who funds THE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds RENEW NEW ENGLAND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds EFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds WHEN WE BAND TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds CERES INC ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ecoRI Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds PROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds BRYANT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds REDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Humane America Animal Foundation · The Greenbaum Foundation · Vegfund Inc · Impactassetsinc · Tipping Point Private Foundation · Island Foundation Inc · Good Ventures Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Everhope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everhope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Marion Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
- Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Everhope Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Everhope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Everhope’s filings →