Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Evergreen Action

Advocate for and reform to climate policies at the national and state level.

$440k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
States reached, FY2024
8
Total assets, FY2024
$2.3M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Environment$195kCivil Rights$135kPublic Benefit$105kEmployment$45k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
UT
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Climate Cabinet Action$50,00012%
Michigan United$50,0001n/a
All Hands on Deck Network Inc$50,0001n/a
Rup Inc$50,000130%
Working Families Organization Inc$50,00010%
America Works USA$45,00010%
Wisconsin Opportunity Coalition Inc$30,00011%
Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc$25,00011%
Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania$25,00011%
Pa Alliance Action$25,00010%
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Evergreen Action by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Climate Cabinet Action$50,00012%
Michigan United$50,0001n/a
All Hands on Deck Network Inc$50,0001n/a
Rup Inc$50,000130%
Working Families Organization Inc$50,00010%
America Works USA$45,00010%
Wisconsin Opportunity Coalition Inc$30,00011%
Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc$25,00011%
Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania$25,00011%
Pa Alliance Action$25,00010%
Pennsylvania United$25,00010%
The Oregon League of Conservation Voters Education Fund$25,00014%
Climate Equity Action Fund$20,00010%
Florida Rising Inc$10,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Evergreen Action supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClimate Cabinet Action: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetRup Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetWorking Families Organization Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerica Works USA: $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWisconsin Opportunity Coalition Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWisconsin Conservation Voters Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetConservation Voters of Pennsylvania: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPa Alliance Action: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPennsylvania United: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Oregon League of Conservation Voters Education Fund: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetClimate Equity Action Fund: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFlorida Rising Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Energy Action Fund · America Votes · Tides Advocacy · Tides Foundation · Our American Future Action · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Pro-Democracy Campaign · League of Conservation Voters Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Evergreen Action with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evergreen Action?

Find your warmest path to Evergreen Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Evergreen Action

How much does Evergreen Action give?
Evergreen Action reported 13 grants totaling $439,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Evergreen Action fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (41%), Civil Rights (28%), Public Benefit (22%).
Who are Evergreen Action's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Climate Cabinet Action ($50k), Michigan United ($50k), All Hands on Deck Network Inc ($50k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Evergreen Action?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sixteen Thirty Fund, Energy Action Fund, America Votes.
Where is Evergreen Action based?
Evergreen Action is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evergreen Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph