Skip to content
Eventide Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Eventide Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$242kHuman Services$202kFood & Nutrition$65kArts & Culture$26kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $98k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT$14,000
LIBERTY HOUSE$12,375
ROCKINGHAM MEALS ON WHEELS$12,375
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL$12,375
COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GRT DERRY$12,375
ANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC$12,375
Individual grant recipient$12,000
SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS YOGA$10,000
STAFFORD MEALS ON WHEELS$8,250
Individual grant recipient$8,250
ASPIRE LIVING AND LEARNING$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,625
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE MUSEUM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%ASPIRE LIVING AND LEARNING: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GRT DERRY: $15k → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $16k → 7%ASPIRE LIVING AND LEARNING: $12k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GRT DERRY: $12k → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $15k → 7%ASPIRE LIVING AND LEARNING: $8k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GRT DERRY: $12k → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $13k → 7%ASPIRE LIVING AND LEARNING: $8k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GRT DERRY: $8k → 5%ASPIRE LIVING AND LEARNING: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GRT DERRY: $8k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $15k → 5%SEACOAST AREA TEACHER OF YOGA: $11k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $14k → 5%SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS YOGA: $10k → 5%SEACOAST AREA TEACHER OF YOGA: $9k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $12k → 5%SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS YOGA: $7k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $10k → 5%SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS YOGA: $6k → 5%WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $9k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$599k · 11 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$599k
$60k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $108k · revenue +61%
  • WO
    WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +67%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Kingdom Council on Aging Inc

We support people age 60 and older persons with disabilities in their efforts to remain active healthy, financially secure, and in control of their own lives. The Agency connects people and the services they they need to live independently…

Human Services
2
Assisted Living Center Inc

Provide assisted living facilities for low to moderate income elders.

Housing & Shelter
3
Adult Day Center of Somerset County Inc

Providing extraordinary day care services for the elderly and disabled residents of Somerset County and support for caregiving families.

Human Services
4
Casa Angelica Foundation

Casa Angelica Foundation provides financial support to enhance the lives of the residents of Casa Angelica, an intermediate care facility for the developmentally disabled.

Religion
5
Americans for Independent Living

Working to empower veterans by providing home modifications, rehabilitation and transitional housing enabling them to become independent within their homes and communities

Housing & Shelter
6
Cidny - Independent Living Services Inc

Home care services (under contract with various mco organizations)

Community Improvement
7
Vermont Congregational Home Inc

Retirement Home - Operation of church sponsored retirement home with 13 rooms and care for up to 15 residents

Human Services
8
Greater Adirondack Home Aides Inc

Greater Adirondack Home Aides, Inc. is a compassionate, professional home care organization providing quality personal care and supportive services to clients and their families throughout Warren, Washington, Saratoga, and surrounding…

Human Services
9
Vermont Assoc of Area Agencies on Aging

The Vermont Association of Area Agencies on Aging (V4A)supports and strengthens Vermonts five Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) to ensure that all Vermonters are able to age with health, independance and dignity.

Philanthropy
10
Bennington County Meals Program

Provide quality, nutritious and creative meals to individuals age sixty years and older; as well as, disabled residents of Bennington County, Vermont. This is accomplished through a community meal program and home deliveries to those…

Food & Nutrition
11
Northeast Independent Living Services

To enhance the rights & independence of people with disabilities to actively participate in their communities & to live self-determined lives.

Unclassified
12
Nantucket Center for Elder Affairs Inc

Provide services to the elderly

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Independence Center; the most unlike its peers is Annie's Angels Memorial Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $86,375 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAULIndividual grant recipient: $49,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $35,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROCKINGHAM MEALS ON WHEELS: $12,375 · OtherLiberty House Inc: $12,375 · Other+3 more: $24,125 · Other+3 moreWOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $59,500 · Human ServicesWOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTTCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $54,875 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRYAspire Living & Learning Inc: $47,500 · Human ServicesAspire Living & Learning IncNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $44,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic CharitiesSATYA SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS OF YOGA IN ACTION: $43,250 · Human ServicesSATYA SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS OF YOGA IN…ANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $108,375 · HealthANNIE'S ANGELS ME…ROCKINGHAM NUTRITION AND MEALS ON WHEELS PROGRAM: $44,300 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER: $26,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$280,250Human Services$249,125Health$108,375Food & Nutrition$44,300Arts & Culture$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $108,375 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetWOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT: $59,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $54,875 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetAspire Living & Learning Inc: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCKINGHAM NUTRITION AND MEALS ON WHEELS PROGRAM: $44,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $44,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSATYA SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS OF YOGA IN ACTION: $43,250 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetAMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER: $26,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANNIE'S ANGELS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENADE OF GREATER SQUAMSCOTT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY ↗
  • Who funds Aspire Living & Learning Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKINGHAM NUTRITION AND MEALS ON WHEELS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds SATYA SEACOAST AREA TEACHERS OF YOGA IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Liberty House Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eventide Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eventide Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Aspire Living & Learning Inc: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eventide Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Eventide Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eventide’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home