Skip to content
Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma Foundation Inc

To support childhood cancer research and patient and survivor wellness programs.

$194k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$471kEducation$60kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $147,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $194,329 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,929 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
$9,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$564k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$35,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DC$25,000
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH$12,400
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
THE CHOP FOUNDATION$10,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CENTER$9,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$8,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$7,000
THE HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,000
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$5,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER AT CITY OF HOPE$5,000
CHESAPEAKE CHARITIES JIMMY MYRICK JR FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $10k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $35k → 22%LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $12k → 8%CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER AT CITY OF HOPE: $10k → 14%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%THE HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%CHESAPEAKE CHARITIES JIMMY MYRICK JR FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DC: $25k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CENTER: $10k → 19%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $10k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $35k → 22%CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER AT CITY OF HOPE: $5k → 14%THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%THE HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $7k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DC: $25k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CENTER: $10k → 19%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $8k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $35k → 22%THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%THE HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DC: $25k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CENTER: $9k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $35k → 22%THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%THE HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DC: $25k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL CENTER: $6k → 19%THE CHOP FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%THE CHOP FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%THE CHOP FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%THE CHOP FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
MA
IA
PA
CA
CO
MD
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$492k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$492k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +45%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +43%
  • SC
    Seattle Children's Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $36k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue +41%
  • A
    ACCELERATE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
3
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
4
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
5
Children's Medical Center Corporation

To operate exclusively for the benefit of The Children's Hospital Corporation and its affiliated organizations in the conduct of their charitable, educational and scientific functions.

Health
6
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Ophthalmology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide ophthalmology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the…

Health
8
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health
9
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
10
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

—
11
Children's Hospital Pediatric Associates Inc

The Foundation provides medical and health care services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital, and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
12
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $140,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIACHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $28,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $23,250 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGANChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $22,500 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital: $17,450 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $17,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $15,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPE: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $22,400 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKIN…STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $25,338 · EducationSTATE UNIVER…Seattle Children's Foundation: $35,500 · OtherSeattle C…ACCELERATE: $10,065 · OtherACCELERAT…CHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Health$435,600Education$60,338Other$45,565Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $35,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $25,338 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $23,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $17,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $12,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evan's Victory Against Neuroblastoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home