· Private foundation
Eureka Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK STAGE AND FILM | $10,000 |
| ST ANN'S WAREHOUSE | $10,000 |
| HAWAI'I COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| LUBEC CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH | $2,500 |
| TIDES INSTITUTE & MUSEUM OF ART | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE INC | $2,000 |
| CARTER CENTER | $2,000 |
| LUBEC COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER | $1,000 |
| LUBEC LIONS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| LUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY | $1,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +229%
- TCTHE CARTER CENTER INC3× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +32%
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +286%
Funded once
- PHPLYMOUTH HOUSEone grant, 2022 · $10k
- FRFOXG1 Research Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +286%
PATH WITH ARTone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.
The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Purposeful living in a diverse community. using the power of resident driven community to enhance wellbeing.
Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
The sophia way is a place of hope and change for women. we support them on their journey from homelessness to safe and stable living.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOXG1 Research Inc ↗
- Who funds PATH WITH ART ↗
- Who funds DOWNEAST COASTAL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUBEC COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOODWARD ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds VISION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds PIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE SERVICES HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds Stewardship Partners ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Garneau Nicon Family Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Medina Foundation · Ellison Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · Windermere Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Lucky Seven Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eureka Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Deschutes Land Trust — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.