· Private foundation
Eugene B Casey Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $300k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+6 grants · $3.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WETA | $2,000,000 |
| OLNEY THEATRE CENTER | $500,000 |
| MARYLAND SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND | $300,000 |
| OLNEY THEATRE CENTER | $300,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN | $250,000 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER MONTGOMERY CO | $250,000 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORPS MARYLAND | $200,000 |
| FEED THE HUNGRY | $200,000 |
| CARE FOR ALS | $136,000 |
| MERCY HEALTH CLINIC | $100,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR | $100,000 |
| BARNS OF ROSE HILL ENDOWMENT | $100,000 |
| HOUSE OF RUTH | $100,000 |
| MY SISTER'S PLACE | $100,000 |
| CARING FOR OTHERS LTD | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GWGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2020–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +30%
- WNWASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +14%
- DEDUKE ELLINGTON SCHOOL OF THE ARTS PROJECTS2× · 2020–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +92%
Funded once
- LALIVE AND LEARN BETHESDA INCone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -99% · 88% of their budget
- OTOLENY THEATRE CENTERone grant, 2021 · $150k
- DGDENYCE GRAVES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Washington Ear Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA ↗
- Who funds DUKE ELLINGTON SCHOOL OF THE ARTS PROJECTS ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON EAR INC ↗
- Who funds THE MERCY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MY SISTER'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CARE FOR ALS INC ↗
- Who funds LIVE AND LEARN BETHESDA INC ↗
- Who funds Caring For Others LTD ↗
- Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
- Who funds BARNS OF ROSE HILL ↗
- Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
- Who funds PATRICK HENRY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Redskin Foundation Inc George Preston Marshall Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Nora Roberts Foundation · Robert I Schattner Foundation Inc aka Schattner Foundation · Lester Poretsky Family Foundation Inc · Adventist Healthcare Inc · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eugene B Casey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Smith Island United Inc — 96% of income from government
- The Maryland School for the Blind — 47% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Everymind Inc — 4% of income from government
- Action Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eugene B Casey Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Eugene B Casey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.