Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ess Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$55kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$2kEducation$550Youth Development$500International$200Public Benefit$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$248k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE$1,500
OUR LADY OF LIGHT$1,500
AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAINT JOSEPH CATHOLIC: $14k → 5%CROW RIVER CHURCH: $7k → 5%SALVATION ARMY: $200 → 11%COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $100 → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $200 → 17%MISSIONARY OBLATES OF MARY: $100 → 16%JUDICIAL WATCH: $200 → 14%OUR LADY OF LIGHT: $5k → 11%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $100 → 13%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION: $2k → 6%BE LIKE TOMMY PROJECT: $500 → 11%SAINT JOSEPH CATHOLIC: $11k → 5%HIGHLANDS CHURCH: $6k → 5%SALVATION ARMY: $200 → 11%SAINT BENEDICT CHURCH: $200 → 11%SMILE TRAIN: $500 → 17%AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE: $100 → 14%OUR LADY OF LIGHT: $2k → 11%FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & ED: $500 → 6%SAINT JOSEPH CATHOLIC: $8k → 5%CROW RIVER CHURCH: $5k → 5%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE: $13k → 11%SMILE TRAIN: $500 → 17%OUR LADY OF LIGHT: $1k → 11%RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $6k → 5%LOVE INC: $500 → 5%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE: $10k → 11%SAINT JOSEPH CATHOLIC: $6k → 5%DELANO SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION: $250 → 5%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE: $4k → 11%SAINT JOSEPH CATHOLIC: $5k → 5%DELANO SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION: $100 → 5%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE: $2k → 11%RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $2k → 5%OUR LADY OF THE LAKE: $500 → 11%LOVE INC: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
KY
VA
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 10 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$104k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+20%

Still filing today

30%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +97%
  • SA
    SCALPEL AT THE CROSS INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +179%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIGHLANDS CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • FA
    FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
8
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
9
American College of Allergy Asthma & Immunology Inc

The american college of allergy, asthma & immunology promotes excellence in the practice of the subspecialty of allergy and immunology.

—
10
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
11
American Academy of Dermatology Inc

To assure that dermatologists have access to the highest quality education, research and innovations in the field, and that patients and the public have access to the highest quality medical and surgical dermatologic care and to…

Health
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $42,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUR LADY OF THE LAKE: $29,400 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE LAKECROW RIVER CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherCROW RIVER CHURCHOUR LADY OF LIGHT: $7,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF LIGHTHIGHLANDS CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS CHURCH+9 more: $5,550 · Other+9 moreRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionSCALPEL AT THE CROSS INC: $1,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $200 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $100 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $100 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · Religion
Other$102,850Philanthropy$7,500Food & Nutrition$2,000International$1,700Public Benefit$200Education$200Health$100Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCALPEL AT THE CROSS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SCALPEL AT THE CROSS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ess Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ess Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ess Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph