Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ervin & Marie Wilkof Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$331k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$428kHuman Services$177kPhilanthropy$66kArts & Culture$54kReligion$21kCommunity Improvement$12kHealth$6k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $260k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$200,000
CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER$60,000
WALSH UNIVERSITY$30,000
STARK STATE COLLEGE$10,251
JRC$10,000
ARTS IN STARK$5,000
CANTON MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
BERNARD & SANFORD WILKOF POST #73$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$2,000
CANTON JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $15k → 13%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $15k → 13%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $13k → 13%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $5k → 13%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $5k → 13%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $60k → 13%CARING AND SERVING TOGETHER: $14k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$686k · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$686k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+88%

Still filing today

62%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $283k · revenue +271%
  • CA
    Caring and Serving Together - CAST
    7× · 2018–2024 · $127k · revenue +268%
  • WU
    Walsh University Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TF
    Topucu Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +88% · 38% of their budget
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CHOICES
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • BS
    BERNARD SANFORD WILKOF POST 73
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau

The Mission of the Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau is to attract and engage visitors, serve and educate regional tourisim partners, and generate economic growth for the community through travel and tourism development.

—
2
Stark County District Library Foundation

Support of the Stark County District Library

Education
3
Stark County Community Unit School District 100 Foundation

The foundation supports scholarships and grants for the educational purposes of stark county community unit school district no. 100

Food & Nutrition
4
Canton Regional Chamber of Commerce

Advancement of the economic, industrial, professional, cultural and civic welfare of stark county and its surrounding region and the promotion and preservation of the competitive free enterprise system.

—
5
Massillon Weststark Chamber

The Massillon WestStark Chamber of Commerce exists to develop, enhance, and represent business, promote economic growth, and improve the quality of life for our community.

—
6
Canton College Preparatory School

Our vision is to create a culture of high expectations for behavior and academics through rigorous, research-based curricula and a focus on achievement. It is our goal that Canton College Preparatory School scholars will attend a college…

Education
7
Stark County Manufacturing Workforce Development Partnership

SCMWDP supports Stark County manufacturers' growth and expansion by offering seamless career pathways, delivering inclusive training and education, and sharing best practices within the manufacturing workforce development community:…

Employment
8
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
9
Columbus State University Foundation Inc

The Columbus State University Foundation supports educational excellence and the expansion of educational opportunities at Columbus State University. The Foundation attracts, receives, invests, manages, and expends gifts and other…

Education
10
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
11
Starr Institute Inc Dba Starr Library

Starr Library shall provide access to the highest quality library services and programming, enriching our lives and building community.

Education
12
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arts in Stark; the most unlike its peers is Topucu Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $283,000 · EducationSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONWalsh University Inc: $80,000 · EducationWalsh University IncMALONE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITY+1 more: $6,000 · EducationJRC: $50,000 · OtherJRCCanton Jewish Community Federation: $35,000 · OtherCanton Jewish Community…TEMPLE ISRAEL: $21,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELBERNARD & SANFORD WILKOF POST #73: $17,000 · OtherBERNARD & SANFORD WILKO…Individual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…STARK STATE COLLEGE: $10,251 · OtherSTARK STATE COLLEGECANTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $8,000 · OtherCaring and Serving Together - CAST: $127,000 · Human ServicesCaring and Serving…Canton Museum of Art: $27,000 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARK: $21,000 · Arts & CultureTopucu Foundation Inc: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Stark County: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Education$399,000Other$159,251Human Services$127,000Arts & Culture$48,000Philanthropy$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $283,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetCaring and Serving Together - CAST: $127,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCanton Jewish Community Federation: $35,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCanton Museum of Art: $27,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTopucu Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Stark County: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTARK COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Caring and Serving Together - CAST ↗
  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Canton Jewish Community Federation ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Canton Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds Topucu Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Stark County ↗
  • Who funds STARK COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Timken Foundation of Canton · Edward & Ruth Wilkof Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · The Ward J and Joy A Timken Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Biery Family Foundation Inc · Hoover W Henry Fund Ta · Ada C Rank & Helen J Rank Charitable

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ervin & Marie Wilkof Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ervin & Marie Wilkof Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ervin & Marie Wilkof Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ervin & Marie Wilkof Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ervin & Marie Wilkof’s filings →

    More from the funding graph