Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ernst Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$913k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$1.9MEducation$1.4MCommunity Improvement$110kHealth$25k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $250k+2 grants · $910k
$385,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRAKE UNIVERSITY$525,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE$385,000
UNITED TO LEARN$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $5k → 14%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $525k → 10%MARQUETTE HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE: $450k → 11%DOWN SYNDROME INNOVATIONS: $15k → 5%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%FINANCIAL HEALTH NETWORK: $75k → 14%UNITED TO LEARN: $3k → 14%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $525k → 10%MARQUETTE HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE: $400k → 11%DOWN SYNDROME GUILD OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $10k → 5%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%FINANCIAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $35k → 14%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE: $400k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE: $385k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $230k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 6 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$1.6M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+2%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +15%
  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2020–2023 · $125k · revenue +52%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
7
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

10
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
11
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Drake University and the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation of Jackson County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $1,635,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUECOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON COUNTY — $240,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON COUNTYDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $1,180,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago — $125,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+3 more — $47,500 · EducationFINANCIAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $110,000 · Community ImprovementMARQUETTE HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherDOWN SYNDROME INNOVATIONS — $25,000 · Other
Philanthropy$1,875,000Education$1,352,500Community Improvement$110,000Other$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $1,635,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $1,180,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON COUNTY — $240,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFINANCIAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $110,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME INNOVATIONS — $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ernst Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph