Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ernest L Richmond & Constance V Richmond Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$217kHousing & Shelter$118kHealth$107kHuman Services$47kFood & Nutrition$37kScience & Tech$28kYouth Development$22kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSGR PETER J DOODY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$14,500
PARENTS & ALUMNI OFR ROBOTICS TEAM 75 INC$14,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$14,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$11,000
SAINT JUDE'S CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$6,000
GIRL SCOUTS HEARTS OF NJ INC$4,000
MAUI FOOD BANK$4,000
ST PETER'S FOOD PANTRY$3,000
RESOLUTION RUN$3,000
MAUI POPS ORCHESTRA$3,000
ST MICHAEL'S FOOD PANTRY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$2,500
CLIFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
HILLSBOROUGH CHEER BOOSTER CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $11k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $9k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$608k · 16 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$608k
$14k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPublic BenefitFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +89%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +27%
  • SP
    St Peters Haven Corporation
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • KS
    KNIGHT S OF COLUMBUS #11671
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BOUND BROOK
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feed the Hungry Pantry of Palm Beach County Inc

Ending hunger in palm beach county

Food & Nutrition
2
Dc Food Project

To provide school children and their families access to additional food during the school day and over the weekends when school meals are not available.

Food & Nutrition
3
Mel-Hi Band Parents Association Inc

Support of Mel-Hi Instrumental Music Department

Arts & Culture
4
Hawaii Foodbank Inc

Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…

Food & Nutrition
5
Warrior Band & Auxiliary Parents Inc

To support, through fund raising and volunteer involvement, the aloha high school band programs

Unclassified
6
Maui Pono Foundation

The maui pono foundation was created to help the people of our community, by the people of our community. we are committed to accountability and making sure your donations are used for what they were intended for, helping the people of…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Tualatin School House Food Pantry

Tualatin food pantry provides emergency food to qualified households in a welcoming envirnonment.

Food & Nutrition
8
Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc

The Palm Beach County Food Bank is dedicated to fighting hunger and improving food security in Palm Beach County by providing food, nutrition education and financial assistance services.

Food & Nutrition
9
Veterans Navigation Network

Transition for service members.

Health
10
Warrior Food Project Inc

Our mission is to help Veterans and First Responders in the United States, their spouses and children, whose unfortunate situations have left them suffering physically and mentally, gain access to special veterans' programs and to educate…

Unclassified
11
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
12
Hawaii Pacific University

Hawaii pacific university is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. students from around the world join us for an american education built on a liberal arts foundation. our innovative undergraduate…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Parents & Alumni for Robotics Team 75 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MSGR PETER J DOODY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $111,000 · OtherMSGR PETER J DOODY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSAINT JUDE'S CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $101,250 · OtherSAINT JUDE'S CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITALPARENTS & ALUMNI OFR ROBOTICS TEAM 75 INC: $28,000 · OtherPARENTS & ALUMNI OFR ROBOTICS TEAM 75 INCGIRL SCOUTS HEARTS OF NJ INC: $22,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS HEARTS OF NJ INCST MICHAEL'S FOOD PANTRY: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · OtherKNIGHT S OF COLUMBUS #11671: $12,250 · Other+6 more: $24,000 · Other+6 moreHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $117,750 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS …PARENTS & ALUMNI FOR ROBOTICS TEAM 75 INC: $88,750 · EducationPARENTS & ALUMNI FO…CLIFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · EducationCLIFTON EDUCATION F…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $46,500 · Human ServicesRESOLUTION RUN INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $8,000 · Food & NutritionMaui Pops Orchestra Inc: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$327,000Housing & Shelter$117,750Education$105,750Human Services$46,500Public Benefit$15,000Food & Nutrition$8,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $117,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS & ALUMNI FOR ROBOTICS TEAM 75 INC: $88,750 over 7y, 12% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $46,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLIFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetRESOLUTION RUN INC: $15,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Peters Haven Corporation: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNASSANS PLACE: $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMaui Pops Orchestra Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS & ALUMNI FOR ROBOTICS TEAM 75 INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOLUTION RUN INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds St Peters Haven Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NASSANS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Maui Pops Orchestra Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ernest L Richmond & Constance V Richmond Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ernest L Richmond & Constance V Richmond Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Nassans Place: 3% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ernest L Richmond & Constance V Richmond’s filings →

More from the funding graph