Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$147k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.1MYouth Development$979kHealth$858kHuman Services$848kAnimals$600kHousing & Shelter$590kEnvironment$500kArts & Culture$425kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $413k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.3M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGELINA COLLEGE$147,000
BETH & HORACE STUBBLEFIELD LEARNING CTR$100,000
LUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG$100,000
WOMEN'S SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC$100,000
TEXAS FORESTRY MUSEUM$100,000
PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF LUFKIN$100,000
HUMANE SOCIETY ANGELINA COUNTY$80,000
LEGACY INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION$75,000
Individual grant recipient$70,766
MUSEUM OF EAST TEXAS$60,000
ANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC$60,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - DEEP EAST TX$60,000
EAST TEXAS PAWS INC$58,000
MOFFETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC$51,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $244k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC: $125k → 16%SEASONS OF HOPE CENTER: $45k → 16%SEASONS OF HOPE CENTER: $23k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $16k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 40 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
17

Total granted

$7.1M
$913k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-7%

Still filing today

48%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TEXAS FORESTRY MUSEUM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +30% · 48% of their budget
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF ANGELINA COUNTY TEXAS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $310k · revenue +35% · 35% of their budget
  • LN
    LUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG
    4× · 2020–2024 · $303k · revenue +275%

Funded once

  • HI
    HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +16%
  • HV
    HUNTINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $122k
  • AC
    ANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -142%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Annas Angels Dog Rescue

Our animal adoption organization is dedicated to improving the lives of southeast texas animals, primarily dogs.

Animals
2
Spca of East Texas Inc

1.serving the city of tyler, smith county, and surrounding areas in the rescue and adoption of homeless animals. 2. promoting and educating our community regarding the serious need for reduction of local pet overpopulation and lowering…

Animals
3
Hope of South Texas Inc

To provide the highest quality of appropriate investigative, assessment, and ongoing thrapeutic treatment services for abused chilren and their families throught the four county service area (victoria, jackson, goliad, and dewitt).

—
4
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
5
East Texas Arboretum and Botanical Society Inc

Management and operation of the arboretum.

Environment
6
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
7
Hospice of East Texas Foundation

Hospice of east texas foundation operates for the benefit of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
8
The History Center

The history center collects, preserves, and makes available the history of our region and its people for the educational use and benefit of present and future generations. geographically, this area includes but is not limited to angelina…

Arts & Culture
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
10
The Economic Development Alliance for Brazoria County

To promote and diversify the economic base, attract high-wage jobs in target industries to Brazoria County and support and champion the interests of existing businesses.

—
11
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
—
12
Casa of Deep East Texas Inc

Train volunteers to advocate for children in court directed foster care.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Shelter of East Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seasons of Hope Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $477,245 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANGELINA COLLEGE: $440,777 · OtherANGELINA COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $290,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $277,705 · OtherMOFFETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $216,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $200,000 · OtherPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF LUFKIN: $194,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $187,960 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DEEP EAST TX: $180,000 · OtherCASA OF THE PINES INC: $252,935 · OtherBETH & HORACE STUBBLEFIELD LEARNING CENTER: $200,000 · Other+32 more: $2,192,772 · Other+32 moreTEXAS FORESTRY MUSEUM: $500,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS FOREST…Museum of East Texas: $225,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Ea…ANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureANGELINA ART…HUMANE SOCIETY OF ANGELINA COUNTY TEXAS: $310,000 · AnimalsEast Texas Paws Inc: $290,000 · AnimalsHOSPICE IN THE PINES INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesSEASONS OF HOPE CENTER: $95,530 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $51,000 · Human ServicesTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesJDS CENTER OF HOPE Inc: $140,000 · Recreation & SportsANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsHermann Eye Fund: $185,615 · HealthEast Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope: $120,000 · HealthLUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG: $302,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,309,694Arts & Culture$925,000Animals$600,000Human Services$421,530Recreation & Sports$340,000Health$305,615Housing & Shelter$302,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS FORESTRY MUSEUM: $500,000 over 5y, 48% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF ANGELINA COUNTY TEXAS: $310,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetLUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG: $302,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetEast Texas Paws Inc: $290,000 over 5y, 75% of budgetCASA OF THE PINES INC: $252,935 over 4y, 18% of budgetMuseum of East Texas: $225,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $200,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetHermann Eye Fund: $185,615 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetLEGACY INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT: $150,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $143,934 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetJDS CENTER OF HOPE Inc: $140,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetHOSPICE IN THE PINES INC: $125,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEast Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope: $120,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetWOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEASONS OF HOPE CENTER: $95,530 over 3y, 23% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUFKIN INC: $80,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE COALITION INC: $79,300 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetANGELINA COUNTY SECOND HELPINGS INC: $65,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $51,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS FORESTRY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF ANGELINA COUNTY TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG ↗
  • Who funds East Texas Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE PINES INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of East Texas ↗
  • Who funds BETH & HORACE STUBBLEFIELD LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANGELINA ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hermann Eye Fund ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT ↗
  • Who funds ANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds JDS CENTER OF HOPE Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC ↗
  • Who funds East Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope ↗
  • Who funds ANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEASONS OF HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUFKIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Simon & Louise Henderson FoundationTX34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Simon & Louise Henderson Foundation · Tll Temple Foundation · The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation · The Pineywoods Foundation · Brookshire Brothers Charitable Foundation · Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club · Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation · Hunter Family Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ernest L Kurth Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph