· Private foundation
Eric P Newman Numismatic Education Society
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $250k+1 grant · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $320,000 |
| AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPERIC P & EVELYN E NEWMAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION DTD 8/1/20134× · 2017–2020 · $15M · revenue -29% · 66% of their budget
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +76%- ANAMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY7× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue -3%
Funded once
- NBNUMISMATIC BIBLIOMANIA SOCIETY INCone grant, 2017 · $10k
- CCCOLONIAL COIN COLLECTORS CLUB INCone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -1%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Publication of the Mineralogical Record Magazine Six Times Each Year. The magazine is the most authoritative and widely respected mineral collectors' journal in the world.
Promote interest and knowledge of philately, primarily related to the classic issues of stamps and postal history of the united states.
Education & history of imperial glass
Advance the knowledge of numismatics along educational, historical and scientific lines.
Education - The Society of Paper Money Collectors publishes a bi-monthly journal (Paper Money) which is distributed to approximately 1,200 dues paying members of the organization featuring articles designed to promote and advance the study…
To promote gaming history
Education about the military newspaper in wars and conflicts
The primary purpose of the organization is the preservation and dissemination of information on arms and armor.
Provide travel, lodging and educational programs for young numismatists age 14-20 to attend witter coin university, classes taught by experts in the industry.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Numismatic Association and the most unlike its peers is Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ERIC P & EVELYN E NEWMAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION DTD 8/1/2013 ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLONIAL COIN COLLECTORS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA UNITED NUMISMATISTS INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY AMERICAN COPPERSINC ↗
- Who funds New York Numismatic Club ↗
- Who funds Missouri Numismatic Society ↗
- Who funds TEXAS NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF AMERICAN FINANCE ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF NUMISMATISTS ↗
- Who funds TOKEN & MEDAL SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eric P Newman Numismatic Education Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eric P Newman Numismatic Education Society?
Find your warmest path to Eric P Newman Numismatic Education Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.