Skip to content

· Private foundation

Equinox Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$346k
Granted FY2022
47
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Equinox Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Innovia Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Equinox Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 27 organizations, $346k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
12
’18
8
’19
30
’20
29
’21
27
’22
9
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.7MEnvironment$922kEducation$350kArts & Culture$206kRecreation & Sports$145kFood & Nutrition$112kYouth Development$83kAnimals$80kOther$0
02FY2022 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k32 grants · $127k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $220k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY RESOURCE ENVISION CENTER$20,000
SANDPOINT AREA SENIORS INC$20,000
PRIEST RIVER MINISTRIES$20,000
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRA$20,000
HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION INSTITUTE$15,000
BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$15,000
COMMUNITY CANCER SERVICES$15,000
PANIDA THEATER COMMITTEE INC$15,000
PAWSITIVE OUTREACH SPAYNEUTER ALLI$15,000
VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC$12,500
KANIKSU LAND TRUST$12,000
PANHANDLE ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION IN$10,000
BOUNDARY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 101$10,000
MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF SANDPOINT IN$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE SHELTER DBA BETTER T$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $15k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10k → 12%SANDPOINT YOUTH CENTER INC: $10k → 12%SANDPOINT YOUTH CENTER INC: $9k → 12%SANDPOINT YOUTH CENTER INC: $9k → 12%ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $6k → 12%ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $5k → 12%ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $5k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $3k → 12%KINDERHAVEN: $3k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $3k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $2k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $2k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $1k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $1k → 12%KINDERHAVEN: $1k → 12%ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $1k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $1k → 12%BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $1k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $1k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 50 repeat orgs$663k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2022, 19 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
18

Total granted

$1.8M
$600k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+60%

Still filing today

58%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KL
    Kaniksu Land Trust Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $789k · revenue +10% · 33% of their budget
  • MC
    MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF SANDPOINT
    5× · 2018–2022 · $145k · revenue +111%
  • SA
    Sandpoint Area Seniors Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ CTY
    one grant, 2017 · $255k
  • IN
    INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $248k
  • SR
    SANDPOINT RESOURCE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
2
Idaho Wildlife Federation

The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.

Animals
3
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
4
Palouse Land Trust Inc

Our mission is to work with landowners and communities to conserve the lands we love, now and forever, and to enrich connections to the natural world.

Environment
5
Southern Idaho Tourism & Recreation Association Inc

Implement an integrated marketing program to inspire, inform, educate, and facilitate the decision making process of visitors to the area.

Community Improvement
6
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
7
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
8
Panhandle Community Radio Inc

Free public radio

Arts & Culture
9
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
10
South Fork Boise River Association

Provide community improvements for the rural idaho mountain communities of pine & featherville, idaho.

Human Services
11
Spokane River Forum

The Spokane River Forums mission is to create materials, events and activities that promote regional dialogues for sustaining a healthy river system while meeting the needs of a growing population.

Environment
12
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sandpoint Area Seniors Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northwest Abortion Access Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Innovia Foundation: $1,427,551 · PhilanthropyInnovia FoundationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ CTY: $255,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ CT…INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $247,980 · OtherINLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATIONPRIEST RIVER MINISTRIES INC: $55,000 · OtherSandpoint Area Seniors Inc: $51,600 · OtherPRIEST RIVER LAMANNA HIGH SCHOOL: $40,500 · OtherCommunity Cancer Services Inc: $42,750 · Other+51 more: $506,800 · Other+51 moreKaniksu Land Trust Inc: $788,500 · EnvironmentKaniksu Land Trust Inc+3 more: $37,000 · EnvironmentMUSIC CONSERVATORY OF SANDPOINT: $145,200 · Arts & CulturePanida Theater Committee Inc: $28,000 · Arts & CulturePEND OREILLE ARTS COUNCIL: $17,000 · Arts & CultureThe Festival at Sandpoint Inc: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER INC: $41,750 · Human ServicesSandpoint Youth Center Inc: $26,500 · Human ServicesANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $17,000 · Human ServicesPANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesKINDERHAVEN INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesPEND OREILLE PEDALERS: $42,500 · Recreation & SportsSANDPOINT NORDIC CLUB INC: $21,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $19,500 · Recreation & SportsIdaho Trails Association: $9,828 · Recreation & SportsPanhandle Alliance for Education: $26,500 · EducationSELKIRK OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP & EDUCAT ION: $11,000 · EducationNORTH IDAHO HIGH SCHOOL AEROSPACE PROGRAM INC: $8,000 · EducationIDAHO WALK BIKE ALLIANCE INC: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · Education
Philanthropy$1,427,551Other$1,199,630Environment$825,500Arts & Culture$199,200Human Services$95,750Recreation & Sports$92,828Education$53,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInnovia Foundation: $1,427,551 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetKaniksu Land Trust Inc: $788,500 over 7y, 33% of budgetMUSIC CONSERVATORY OF SANDPOINT: $145,200 over 5y, 11% of budgetSandpoint Area Seniors Inc: $51,600 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetCommunity Cancer Services Inc: $42,750 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetPEND OREILLE PEDALERS: $42,500 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetBONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER INC: $41,750 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetPAWSITIVE OUTREACH SPAY NEUTER ADVOCATES: $30,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetPanida Theater Committee Inc: $28,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetLAKE PEND OREILLE WATERKEEPER INC: $27,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSandpoint Youth Center Inc: $26,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetPanhandle Alliance for Education: $26,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBONNER COUNTY HOMELESS TASK FORCE: $23,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCOTCHMAN PEAKS WILDERNESS INC: $22,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetFIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC: $21,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSANDPOINT NORDIC CLUB INC: $21,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetSANDPOINT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $18,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $17,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetPEND OREILLE ARTS COUNCIL: $17,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSELKIRK CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetEUREKA INSTITUTE INC (THE): $12,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetSELKIRK OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP & EDUCAT ION: $11,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetIdaho Trails Association: $9,828 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetFriends of the Shelter Inc dba Better Together Animal Alliance: $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD FOR OUR CHILDREN INC: $8,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetThe Festival at Sandpoint Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIDAHO WALK BIKE ALLIANCE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetPANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetClark Fork Area Senior Services Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetBonner Community Housing Agency Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKINDERHAVEN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpokane Public Radio: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Innovia Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Kaniksu Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF SANDPOINT ↗
  • Who funds Sandpoint Area Seniors Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Cancer Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEND OREILLE PEDALERS ↗
  • Who funds BONNER COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSITIVE OUTREACH SPAY NEUTER ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds Panida Theater Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE PEND OREILLE WATERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds Sandpoint Youth Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Panhandle Alliance for Education ↗
  • Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BONNER COUNTY HOMELESS TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SCOTCHMAN PEAKS WILDERNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDPOINT NORDIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDPOINT RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT ↗
  • Who funds PEND OREILLE ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SELKIRK CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds EUREKA INSTITUTE INC (THE) ↗
  • Who funds SELKIRK OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP & EDUCAT ION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA70.7× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Avista Foundation · Community Assistance League Inc · The Robert I Wishnick Foundation Dba the William Wishnick Foundation · Hymowitz Family Foundation · The Confidence Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Star Peak Foundation · United Way of North Idaho Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Van Vleet Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Equinox Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Equinox Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Equinox Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Equinox Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Equinox’s filings →

    More from the funding graph