Skip to content

· Public charity

Equal Justice USA Inc

Our mission is to transform the justice system by promoting responses to violence that break cycles of trauma.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Youth Development$180kCommunity Improvement$40kHealth$20k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$136,293
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUSTICE INNOVATION INC$350,000
GOODNATION FOUNDATION$175,000
REIMAGINING JUSTICE INC$150,000
HUBB ARTS AND TRAUMA CENTER$150,000
THE BRIDGE AGENCY INC$138,600
MOMS ON A MISSION$136,293
JUST US FAMILY GROUP HOME$135,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC$119,800
SILENCE IS VIOLENCE$112,471
PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE$100,000
MICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT$7,622
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE BRIDGE AGENCY INC: $139k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
BlackPush Inc

Our organization combats gun violence works to turn out the vote pushes for laws to help previously incarcerated and issues related to social injustice.

Religion
2
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
3
Daughters Beyond Incarceration

DBI vision is for every daughter with an incarcerated parent to live a healthy stable life and have a strong, positive, relationship with her parent during and after incarceration.

Youth Development
4
Endangered Kind Inc

Endangered Kind mission is to reduce gun violence using a community-driven approach that fosters trust to reach, restore, and sustain quality of life for high-risk youth and young adults ages 15-27 in the City of Philadelphia.

Human Services
5
Urban Youth Ministry of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Youth

—
6
Take Action Mon Valley

To combat ALL forms of community violence through activism and organizing

Crime & Legal
7
Prison Policy Initiative

The Organization challenges over-criminalizationand mass incarceration through research, advocacyand organizing.

Civil Rights
8
Force Detroit Inc

FORCE Faithfully Organizing Resources for Community Empowerment is a culmination of interfaith, grassroots and public sector leaders committed to having hard conversations about complex community issues, pushing boundaries and generating…

Human Services
9
Art for Resistance Through Change

Raise awareness of social justice

Arts & Culture
10
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
11
No More Tears Inc

No more tears is a violence- and crime-prevention program founded in 2002 by men incarcerated at san quentin and concerned citizens both seeking to remedy the rise of violent crime in their communities and reduce the recidivism rate of…

Crime & Legal
12
Journey 4WARD

Journey4ward's mission is to ensure that all families have immediate access to meaningful, effective mental healthcare necessary to heal and restore them while helping them through pitfalls associated with unaddressed trauma. We are a…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Silence Is Violence Fka New Orleans Bayou Steppers Social Aid & Pleasure; the most unlike its peers is Let Your Voice Be Heard. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $350,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE INNOVATION INCTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100,000 · Crime & LegalTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INIT…FP YouthOutcry Foundation Inc DBA The Hubb Arts & Trauma Center: $330,000 · Youth DevelopmentFP YouthOutcry Found…MOMS ON A MISSION: $136,293 · OtherMOMS ON A MISSIONJUST US FAMILY GROUP HOME: $135,000 · OtherJUST US FAMILY GROUP HOMESILENCE IS VIOLENCE FKA NEW ORLEANS BAYOU STEPPERS SOCIAL AID & PLEASURE: $112,471 · OtherSILENCE IS VIOLENCE FKA NEW…A GALVANIZED INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO: $40,000 · OtherA GALVANIZED INNOVATIVE APP…Let Your Voice Be Heard: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $7,622 · OtherGoodnation Foundation Inc: $175,000 · PhilanthropyGoodnation Fo…MICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMICHIGAN ORGA…REIMAGINING JUSTICE INC: $150,000 · EducationREIMAGINI…The BRidge Agency INC: $138,600 · Human ServicesSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $119,800 · Environment
Crime & Legal$450,000Youth Development$330,000Other$451,386Philanthropy$225,000Education$150,000Human Services$138,600Environment$119,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $350,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFP YouthOutcry Foundation Inc DBA The Hubb Arts & Trauma Center: $330,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetREIMAGINING JUSTICE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSILENCE IS VIOLENCE FKA NEW ORLEANS BAYOU STEPPERS SOCIAL AID & PLEASURE: $112,471 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetA GALVANIZED INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO: $40,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLet Your Voice Be Heard: $20,000 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Annie E Casey Foundation IncMD13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Equal Justice USA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Equal Justice USA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Fp YouthOutcry Foundation Inc Dba the Hubb Arts & Trauma Center: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Equal Justice USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph