Skip to content
Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc

Solicit, receive, maintain and distribute funds and property to assist affiliated entities and in furtherance of this purpose, to accept, hold and invest gifts and bequests, and to contribute and donate income or principal for the support and benefit of these organizations.

$523k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$8.2MHuman Services$1.2MHealth$979k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
$37,286
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH INC$127,946
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING IRONDEQUOIT LLC$105,763
EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES$90,936
CH SERVICES INC$49,736
GATES SENIOR HOUSING INC$37,286
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING OF GREECE LLC$33,797
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING HONEOYE FALLS LLC$22,926
VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC$20,606
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING ROCHESTER LLC$14,744
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING PENFIELD$12,136
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $882k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $145k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $121k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $22k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES: $98k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES: $91k → 14%ESLC: $80k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $60k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $41k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $34k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $21k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $12k → 14%ESLC: $11k → 14%ESLC: $7k → 14%CH SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%CH SERVICES INC: $41k → 14%CH SERVICES: $28k → 14%CH SERVICES: $15k → 14%CH SERVICES: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 11 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$10M
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+258%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GATES SENIOR HOUSING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $984k · revenue +32%
  • TC
    THE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $979k · revenue +36%
  • ES
    EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $381k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • EH
    ECH HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +258%
  • ES
    EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $234 · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc

Solicit, receive, maintain and distribute funds and property to assist affiliated entities and in furtherance of this purpose, to accept, hold and invest gifts and bequests, and to contribute and donate income or principal for the support…

Housing & Shelter
2
St Paul's Episcopal Home Inc

St. paul's is spiritually guided to help seniors lead enriched lives through excellent and innovative services.

Human Services
3
Episcopal Church Home

As an interdenominational christian community retirement and care facility, the episcopal church home is dedicated to providing a full range of high-quality resident services from long term alzheimer's/memory care to short term…

Human Services
4
Episcopal Communities Foundation

To provide to senior and disabled adults with restricted income, safe and affordable housing and access to related services in a home-like environment.

Human Services
5
St Joseph Residence Inc

St. joseph residence, a skilled nursing home, and marian heights apartments, a residential apartment facility, and trinity terrace & monarch meadows, a community-based residential facility sponsored by catholic health international. we…

—
6
St Peters Senior Services Corporation

Provides various forms of ministry, programs, care, and other services to seniors and carries on other charitable and educational activities associated with this goal, as allowed by law.

—
7
Esplanade Garden Senior Inc
Health
8
Episcopal Retirement Homes Inc

We enrich the lives of older adults in a person-centered, innovative, and spiritually based way.

Human Services
9
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Episcopal Senior Housing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brentland Woods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING IRONDEQUOIT LLC: $4,701,682 · OtherEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING IRONDEQUOIT LLCEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING PENFIELD LLC: $2,378,137 · OtherEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING PENFIELD LLC+5 more: $469,877 · Other+5 moreGATES SENIOR HOUSING INC: $983,638 · Housing & ShelterGATES SENI…+1 more: $234 · Housing & ShelterTHE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER: $979,012 · HealthTHE CHURCH…EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $381,479 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL…VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $359,994 · Human ServicesVALLEY MA…CH SERVICES INC: $140,337 · Human ServicesCH SERVIC…
Other$7,549,696Housing & Shelter$983,872Health$979,012Human Services$881,810

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATES SENIOR HOUSING INC: $983,638 over 8y, 17% of budgetTHE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER: $979,012 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetEPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $381,479 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetVALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $359,994 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCH SERVICES INC: $140,337 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBRENTLAND WOODS INC: $36,949 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetECH HOUSING INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING INC: $234 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATES SENIOR HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRENTLAND WOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds ECH HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Episcopal Seniorlife …
Episcopal Seniorlife Communities IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Episcopal Seniorlife Communities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Episcopal Church Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home