Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc

Solicit, receive, maintain and distribute funds and property to assist affiliated entities and in furtherance of this purpose, to accept, hold and invest gifts and bequests, and to contribute and donate income or principal for the support and benefit of these organizations.

$523k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$8.2MHuman Services$1.2MHealth$979k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
$37,286
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH INC$127,946
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING IRONDEQUOIT LLC$105,763
EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES$90,936
CH SERVICES INC$49,736
GATES SENIOR HOUSING INC$37,286
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING OF GREECE LLC$33,797
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING HONEOYE FALLS LLC$22,926
VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC$20,606
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING ROCHESTER LLC$14,744
EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING PENFIELD$12,136
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $882k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $145k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $121k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $22k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES: $98k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES: $91k → 14%ESLC: $80k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $60k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $41k → 14%EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $34k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $21k → 14%VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $12k → 14%ESLC: $11k → 14%ESLC: $7k → 14%CH SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%CH SERVICES INC: $41k → 14%CH SERVICES: $28k → 14%CH SERVICES: $15k → 14%CH SERVICES: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 11 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$10M
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+258%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GATES SENIOR HOUSING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $984k · revenue +32%
  • TC
    THE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $979k · revenue +36%
  • ES
    EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $381k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • EH
    ECH HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +258%
  • ES
    EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $234 · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc

Solicit, receive, maintain and distribute funds and property to assist affiliated entities and in furtherance of this purpose, to accept, hold and invest gifts and bequests, and to contribute and donate income or principal for the support…

Housing & Shelter
2
St Paul's Episcopal Home Inc

St. paul's is spiritually guided to help seniors lead enriched lives through excellent and innovative services.

Human Services
3
Episcopal Church Home

As an interdenominational christian community retirement and care facility, the episcopal church home is dedicated to providing a full range of high-quality resident services from long term alzheimer's/memory care to short term…

Human Services
4
Episcopal Communities Foundation

To provide to senior and disabled adults with restricted income, safe and affordable housing and access to related services in a home-like environment.

Human Services
5
St Joseph Residence Inc

St. joseph residence, a skilled nursing home, and marian heights apartments, a residential apartment facility, and trinity terrace & monarch meadows, a community-based residential facility sponsored by catholic health international. we…

6
St Peters Senior Services Corporation

Provides various forms of ministry, programs, care, and other services to seniors and carries on other charitable and educational activities associated with this goal, as allowed by law.

7
Esplanade Garden Senior Inc
Health
8
Episcopal Retirement Homes Inc

We enrich the lives of older adults in a person-centered, innovative, and spiritually based way.

Human Services
9
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

10
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Episcopal Senior Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Brentland Woods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING IRONDEQUOIT LLC — $4,701,682 · OtherEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING IRONDEQUOIT LLCEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING PENFIELD LLC — $2,378,137 · OtherEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING PENFIELD LLC+5 more — $469,877 · Other+5 moreGATES SENIOR HOUSING INC — $983,638 · Housing & ShelterGATES SENI…+1 more — $234 · Housing & ShelterTHE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER — $979,012 · HealthTHE CHURCH…EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC — $381,479 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL…VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC — $359,994 · Human ServicesVALLEY MA…CH SERVICES INC — $140,337 · Human ServicesCH SERVIC…
Other$7,549,696Housing & Shelter$983,872Health$979,012Human Services$881,810

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGATES SENIOR HOUSING INC — $983,638 over 8y, 17% of budgetTHE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER — $979,012 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetEPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC — $381,479 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetVALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC — $359,994 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCH SERVICES INC — $140,337 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBRENTLAND WOODS INC — $36,949 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetECH HOUSING INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING INC — $234 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATES SENIOR HOUSING INC
  • Who funds THE CHURCH HOME OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN ROCHESTER
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SENIORLIFE COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds VALLEY MANOR OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC
  • Who funds CH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BRENTLAND WOODS INC
  • Who funds ECH HOUSING INC
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SENIOR HOUSING INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Episcopal Seniorlife Communities IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Episcopal Seniorlife Communities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Episcopal Church Home Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph