Skip to content

· Public charity

Environmental Research & Education Foundation

To advance scientific research and create educational pathways that enable innovation in sustainable waste management practices.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$182k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$3.8MEducation$1.9MScience & Tech$1.2MHealth$398kFood & Nutrition$226kSocial Science$122kRecreation & Sports$55k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $739,352, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,383,487 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $644,135 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $314k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $422k
$23,499
Median grant
9
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$182,400
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA$149,885
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE$89,611
YALE UNIVERSITY$38,800
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA$36,800
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$35,201
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$33,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$28,942
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$23,499
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$16,700
FLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY$16,312
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$16,108
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$15,500
DUKE UNIVERSITY$15,000
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$14,391
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $134k → 10%BRIDGER PHOTONICS INC: $73k → 10%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $144k → 11%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG: $50k → 14%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY: $65k → 17%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $75k → 18%CHAMPIONX LLC: $60k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $52k → 13%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $59k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $135k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $122k → 18%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $238k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE: $90k → 10%GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $104k → 13%SKUMATZ ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: $81k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $135k → 19%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $182k → 15%ENGINEERED COMPOST SYSTEMS: $120k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-CHICAGO: $54k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $75k → 6%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND: $78k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA: $150k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $66k → 15%BRIDGER PHOTONICS INC: $55k → 10%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $56k → 18%UNIV OF TEXAS-AUSTIN ON BEHALF OF: $86k → 10%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $49k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $126k → 16%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $236k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE: $90k → 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $103k → 11%GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $77k → 13%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $182k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $80k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA: $150k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $64k → 15%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $128k → 19%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $130k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $68k → 11%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH: $75k → 19%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $105k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $78k → 8%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD: $75k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $59k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $56k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $56k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $53k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $48k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DE
AZ
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $146k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $115k to organizations and $32k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$141k · 97% · 2 grants · 6 people

Stated purpose: QUANTIFICATION OF PFAS IN SOURCE SEPARATED ORGANIC PROCESSING · EVALUATING MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF LANDFILL EMISSIONS · SCHOLARSHIPS

United Kingdom$5k · 3% · 1 person

Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIPS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 29 repeat orgs$772k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
16

Total granted

$6.8M
$715k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+12%

Still filing today

24%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $302k · revenue +21%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $245k · revenue +37%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $219k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • Bucknell University
    one grant, 2023 · $144k · revenue +12%
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $122k
  • EC
    ENGINEERED COMPOST SYSTEMS
    one grant, 2021 · $120k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
3
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Clemson University Research Foundation

To generate research funding opportunities for clemson university to support research initiatives that advance university discoveries to create new products and services for public use and benefit.

Education
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Delaware State University

Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida State University Research Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Duke University Health System Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,544,085 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $452,832 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $364,800 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYBOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $299,770 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $299,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INC: $278,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $261,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $245,024 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $218,948 · Other+30 more: $2,319,676 · Other+30 moreFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $302,336 · EducationFLORIDA STATE …The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $149,982 · EducationThe Research F…CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $145,000 · EducationCLARKSON UNIVE…Bucknell University: $143,985 · EducationBucknell Unive…Yale University: $138,175 · EducationYale Universit…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STA…+1 more: $26,686 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $219,300 · HealthGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $194,873 · Health
Other$6,283,135Education$1,006,164Health$414,173

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $302,336 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $245,024 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $219,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $194,873 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $149,982 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $145,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University: $143,985 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $138,175 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $26,686 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Carolina Research Foundation: $12,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Chemical SocietyDC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Chemical Society · National Academy of Sciences · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Environmental Research & Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Environmental Research & Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
  • Yale University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Environmental Research & Education Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Environmental Research & Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Environmental Research & Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph