Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Earthshare Washington

EARTHSHARE WASHINGTON's mission is to unite people, organizations and resources to champion washington's environmental future with a vision of everyone working together for thriving communities and a healthy environment.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Employment$1.1MEnvironment$563kRecreation & Sports$25kFood & Nutrition$13kAnimals$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$18,133
Median grant
2
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION$20,114
EARTHSHARE (ESC)$18,133
CLIMATE SOLUTIONS$7,432
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EARTHSHARE: $132k → 14%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $17k → 9%Climate Solutions: $32k → 9%EarthShare National: $320k → 8%EARTHSHARE: $86k → 14%WA Trails Assoc: $61k → 9%Climate Solutions: $12k → 9%EarthShare National: $195k → 8%EARTHSHARE (ESC): $18k → 14%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $15k → 9%EarthShare National: $177k → 8%WA Trails Assoc: $52k → 9%EARTHSHARE: $62k → 8%Climate Solutions: $10k → 9%EarthShare National: $47k → 8%WA Trails Assoc: $43k → 9%EarthShare National: $43k → 8%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $10k → 9%WA Trails Assoc: $38k → 9%Washington Environmental Council: $8k → 9%WA Trails Assoc: $36k → 9%Washington Environmental Council: $8k → 9%Mountains to Sound Greenway T: $29k → 9%CLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $7k → 9%Mountains to Sound Greenway T: $27k → 9%Transportation Choices Coalition: $5k → 9%Mountains to Sound Greenway T: $12k → 9%Puget Soundkeeper Alliance: $7k → 9%Earth Corps: $6k → 9%Cascade Bicycle Club: $5k → 9%Seattle Tilth: $7k → 9%WA Wild: $7k → 9%WA Wild: $7k → 9%Seattle Tilth: $6k → 9%Forterra: $8k → 9%Forterra: $8k → 9%Forterra: $7k → 9%Forterra: $7k → 9%WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $36k → 9%WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $28k → 9%Mountains to Sound Greenway T: $22k → 9%WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 9%WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $17k → 9%Puget Soundkeeper Alliance: $7k → 9%TRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION: $9k → 9%Mountains to Sound Greenway T: $8k → 9%Audubon Washington: $5k → 9%Transportation Choices Coalition: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$654k · 9 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$654k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $332k · revenue +96%
  • CS
    CLIMATE SOLUTIONS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +153%
  • TM
    The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust
    5× · 2017–2021 · $98k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • E
    Earthcorpsgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • WB
    WASHINGTON BIKES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

2
Whatcom Land Trust

The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.

Environment
3
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
4
Washington Forest Protection Association

Wfpa advocates and advnances sustainable forestry in washington to protect and enhance the economic investment of private working forest landowners.

5
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

6
EarthGen Fka Wa Green Schools

EarthGens mission is to guide and support youth, educators, and school communities to become leaders for a healthy environment.

Environment
7
Stewardship Partners

Stewardship Partners helps private landowners restore and preserve the natural landscapes of WA State. We collaborate with diverse interest groups to build bridges and find solutions that achieve mutual goals of environmental protection,…

Environment
8
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
9
Council of Western State Foresters

The council of western state foresters (cwsf) promotes the conservation, protection, and sustainable management of forests for today and generations to come by leading collective action, fostering learning, facilitating resource sharing,…

Environment
10
Alaska Wildlife Alliance

Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…

Environment
11
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
12
Conservation Nw

We protect, connect and restore wildlands and wildlife from the washington coast to the british columbia rockies.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Conservation Action Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EARTHSHARE — $1,079,031 · EnvironmentEARTHSHAREThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust — $97,800 · EnvironmentThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust+5 more — $88,211 · Environment+5 moreWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $332,289 · OtherWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATIO…CLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $107,866 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONSTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION — $20,162 · Community ImprovementWASHINGTON WILD — $13,331 · AnimalsEarthcorps — $6,045 · InternationalWASHINGTON BIKES — $5,287 · Recreation & Sports
Environment$1,265,042Other$440,155Community Improvement$20,162Animals$13,331International$6,045Recreation & Sports$5,287

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEARTHSHARE — $1,079,031 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $332,289 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $107,866 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust — $97,800 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFORTERRA NW — $29,994 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE — $24,372 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION — $20,162 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $15,818 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON WILD — $13,331 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTILTH ALLIANCE — $12,796 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEarthcorps — $6,045 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON BIKES — $5,287 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $5,231 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bullitt FoundationWA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bullitt Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation · The Hugh and Jane Ferguson Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · The Rose Foundation for Communities the Environment · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Kaleidoscope Foundation · Laird Norton Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Earthshare Washington funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph