Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Enterprise Minnesota Inc

To promote economic growth and job creation through applied research, technology transfer, and productive development.

$6k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Community Improvement$282kRecreation & Sports$19k
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALDERON INDUSTRIES$5,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%KIT MASTERS: $26k → 9%AAGARD GROUP LLC: $27k → 9%ACTION FABRICATING INC: $20k → 10%HANCOCK CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC: $5k → 11%RAPAT CORP: $10k → 11%Vector Window: $11k → 10%Kit Masters: $23k → 9%Douglas Machine Inc: $8k → 9%SNAPPY CO: $10k → 10%WESTMOR INDUSTRIES LLC: $10k → 11%RAPAT CORP: $9k → 11%VECTOR WINDOW: $9k → 10%Industrial Finishing Services Inc: $13k → 9%ALEXANDRIA PRECISION MACHINING: $6k → 9%HCB INC: $8k → 10%ALDERON INDUSTRIES: $9k → 11%KIT MASTERS: $12k → 9%SNAPPY CO: $6k → 10%ALDERON INDUSTRIES: $6k → 11%NORTHERN CONTOURS INC: $19k → 9%TEAM INDUSTRIES: $5k → 10%STONEL METSO: $17k → 9%Northern Contours Inc: $11k → 9%VECTOR WINDOWS: $8k → 9%ShoreMaster LLC: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$167k · 6 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$167k
$133k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KIT MASTERS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k
  • NC
    NORTHERN CONTOURS INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $30k
  • VW
    Vector Window
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k

Funded once

  • AG
    AAGARD GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $27k
  • AF
    ACTION FABRICATING INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • SM
    STONEL METSO
    one grant, 2018 · $17k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2020.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172020, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIT MASTERS — $59,596 · OtherKIT MASTERSNORTHERN CONTOURS INC — $29,943 · OtherNORTHERN CONTOURS INCVector Window — $28,026 · OtherVector WindowAAGARD GROUP LLC — $27,271 · OtherAAGARD GROUP LLCACTION FABRICATING INC — $19,800 · OtherACTION FABRICATING INCRAPAT CORP — $19,600 · OtherRAPAT CORPSTONEL METSO — $16,835 · OtherSTONEL METSOSNAPPY CO — $15,293 · OtherALDERON INDUSTRIES — $14,750 · OtherIndustrial Finishing Services Inc — $13,150 · Other+8 more — $55,944 · Other+8 more
Other$300,208

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Enterprise Minnesota Inc?

Find your warmest path to Enterprise Minnesota Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph