Skip to content

· Private foundation

Enrique and Alexis Koenig Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$133kReligion$104kHealth$66kRecreation & Sports$50kPhilanthropy$50kInternational$45kFood & Nutrition$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY MEDIATION$15,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT - STATION 19$15,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY MEDIATION$10,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$10,000
BUTLER INITIATIVE$10,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY MEDIATION$10,000
BUTLER INITIATIVE$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC$5,000
GRACE RESOURCES$5,000
GRACE RESOURCES$5,000
BUTLER INITIATIVE$5,000
MEDIATION CENTER OF LOS ANGELES$5,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$5,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $25k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $20k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 9 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$403k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +53%
  • MC
    MEDIATION CENTER OF LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +517%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
4
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
5
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Springfield Rescue Mission

The goal of the springfield rescue mission since 1892 has been to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the hungry, homeless, addicted, and poor by introducing them to christ and helping them apply the word of god to every area of their…

Human Services
8
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
9
Jesus Knows My Name Ministry

Spread the good news of jesus christ to the homeless of the skid row in los angeles.

Religion
10
God's Image
Human Services
11
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
12
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mediation Center of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Grace Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATIONLOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT - STATION 19: $42,783 · OtherLOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT - STATIO…LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,223 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherButler Initiative: $103,675 · ReligionButler InitiativeSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $44,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSESouthern California Family Mediation Inc: $70,000 · Crime & LegalSouthern Califor…CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED …MEDIATION CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $16,000 · HealthGrace Resource Center Inc: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$161,506Religion$148,175Crime & Legal$70,000Human Services$50,000Education$25,000Health$16,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern California Family Mediation Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $44,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIATION CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,223 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enrique and Alexis Koenig Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enrique and Alexis Koenig Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Enrique and Alexis Koenig Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Enrique and Alexis Koenig Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enrique and Alexis Koenig’s filings →

    More from the funding graph