· Public charity
Emergency Food Network
Provide food for three days of balanced meals to individuals and families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $96,294 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $111,851 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,557 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE | $20,548 |
| WESTHAVEN CARES CENTER | $18,791 |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY SCHOOLS | $13,263 |
| ALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIES | $9,767 |
| INTERNATIONAL NEIGHBORS | $8,250 |
| CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION | $6,750 |
| CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP | $6,675 |
| CITY OF PROMISE | $6,250 |
| SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BRBLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS5× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +29%
- PHPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +19%
- INInternational Neighbors Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $17k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- AFALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIESone grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
- COCITY OF PROMISE INCgraduatedone grant, 2025 · $6k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.
We provide low income housing
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Community outreach holistic development
Presentation partners in housings (ppih) mission is to assist individuals and families experiencing or at risk of experiencing homelessness. ppih imagines a just and equitable fargo-moorhead community where the most vulnerable among us are…
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
Housing initiative partnership, inc. (hip) develops innovative affordable housing, revitalizes neighborhoods and equips people to achieve their housing and financial goals. hip's vision is that every person lives in high-quality affordable…
To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.
Empower and provide support to families with children experiencing homelessness in Central Minnesota.
The partnership against domestic violence, inc. (padv) works to end the crime of domestic violence and to empower its survivors
Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piedmont Housing Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Virginia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds International Neighbors Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CITY OF PROMISE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlottesville · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · Wardle Family Foundation · The Charles Fund Inc · Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr · Manning Family Foundation · Shames Family Foundation · Cassiopeia Foundation Inc · Perry Foundation Inc · The Oak Hill Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Emergency Food Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.