· Private foundation
Elsie Miller Palmer & Ben a Miller Scholarship Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of ELSIE MILLER PALMER & BEN A MILLER SCHOLARSHIP TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $1,050 |
| Individual grant recipient | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $450 |
| Individual grant recipient | $450 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2017–2020 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2017–2019 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2017–2020 · $2k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $900
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elsie Miller Palmer & Ben a Miller Scholarship Trust?
Find your warmest path to Elsie Miller Palmer & Ben a Miller Scholarship Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.