How much did ELMORE & ALYCE KRAEMER CHAR TR grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of ELMORE & ALYCE KRAEMER CHAR TR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k4 grants · $3k
$50k–250k24 grants · $4.8M
$250k+1 grant · $399k

$199,809

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

THE CHRISTIAN WOMEN OF$398,966
THE SALVATION ARMY$199,809
WEST BEND LITTLE LEAGUE$199,809
ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$199,809
GIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN SE$199,809
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$199,809
ST FRANCIS SEMINARY$199,809
THE AMERICAN RED CROSS$199,809
MORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC$199,809
KETTLE MORAINE YMCA INC$199,809
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$199,809
BAY LAKES COUNCIL -$199,809
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$199,809
UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$199,809
THE THRESHOLD INC$199,809

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $453k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.0M · 31 repeat orgs$414k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.0M

$14k

Still filing today

39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TL
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +110%
TT
THE THRESHOLD INC
7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +17%
MP
MORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC
7× · 2019–2025 · $246k · revenue +56%

Funded once

FO
FRIENDS OF ABUSED FAMILIES
one grant, 2019 · $7k
WC
WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH
one grant, 2019 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Whatcom Land Trust

Protecting the rich and vibrant lands for a healthy, thriving Whatcom County for generations to come.

Environment

United Way of Washington County

Our mission is to unite people, resources and organizations to improve lives in washington county. the united way of washington county envisions a community where everyone achieves their human potential through education, financial…

Philanthropy

United Way of Whatcom County

To enable financial stability for every person in whatcom county.

Philanthropy

Landmark Conservancy Inc

To preserve, protect & enhance the natural & scenic land & water resources of wisconsin & adjacent areas for conservation, recreational & cultural purposes.

Environment

Waterbury Development Corporation

Long range planning for economic development

Community Improvement

Western Reserve Community

Works to enhance the quality of life by providing affordable housing and improving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement

Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

Working to further restoration and conservation of wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources.

Environment

Westconsin Credit Union

To give members, communities, and one another the inspiration, resources, and support to achieve financial wellness.

—

Waukesha County Community Foundation

A community foundation with endowment funds that provide grant support to charities.

Philanthropy

Land Conservancy of West Michigan

The Land Conservancy of West Michigan exists to help people protect, enjoy and care for natural land in West Michigan.

Environment

Washington County Community Foundation

To improve the quality of life in washington county by promoting and facilitating philanthropy. the washington county community foundation (foundation) typically receives support from businesses and individuals that have a presence or…

Philanthropy

Washington Area Community Investment

To increase equity and economic opportunity by investing knowledge, social, and financial capital in low- and moderate-income washington area entrepreneurs.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Washington County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Threshold Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

10/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,430,270Education$492,012Human Services$452,941Health$246,007Environment$246,007Animals$246,006Philanthropy$246,006Youth Development$24,601

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Bend Community Foundation IncWI26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Bend Community Foundation Inc · Oscar & Augusta Schlegel Fdn · Westbury Bank Charitable Foundation · Prescott Family Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Community Trust Norman a Schowalter · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ELMORE & ALYCE KRAEMER CHAR TR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WASHINGTON COUNTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 391248660 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WASHINGTON COUNTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Elmore & Alyce Kraemer Char Tr?

Find your warmest path to Elmore & Alyce Kraemer Char Tr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ELMORE & ALYCE KRAEMER CHAR TR

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Elmore & Alyce Kraemer Char Tr?

More from the funding graph

ELMORE & ALYCE KRAEMER CHAR TR

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Elmore & Alyce Kraemer Char Tr?

More from the funding graph