Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ellen and Samuel Phelan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$117kArts & Culture$86kEducation$72kEmployment$27kPhilanthropy$24kReligion$22kRecreation & Sports$15kHealth$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINNAKEE LAND TRUST$9,459
TABOR ACADEMY$5,100
NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
SUMMER SEARCH BOSTON$5,000
NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST$5,000
HISTORIC RED HOOK$5,000
DAMIANO CENTER$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH$4,000
NATIVITY CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
HUDSON RIVER ICE YACHT PRESERVATION TRUST$2,500
PCOM ALUMNI RELATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT$2,100
SMITH COLLEGE ALUMNI FUND$2,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HUMANE BORDERS: $1k → 15%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%DAMIANO CENTER: $4k → 15%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%DAMIANO CENTER: $3k → 15%RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 9%RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$407k · 64 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

64 repeat relationships: 50 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
33

Total granted

$407k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+25%

Still filing today

59%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +699%
  • NC
    NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +405%
  • HR
    HUDSON RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM
    6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DELUTH
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARLINGTON
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
4
Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research Inc

The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).

Environment
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
8
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
9
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
10
Northeastern Regional Association of Coastal Ocean Observing Systems

The northeastern regional association of coastal and ocean observing systems' (neracoos) mission is to produce, integrate and communicate high- quality information that helps ensure safety, economic and environmental resilience, and…

Science & Tech
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Aquidneck Island Land Trust

To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ascienzo Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
43/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIVITY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $17,000 · OtherNATIVITY CATHOLIC CHURCHBARD COLLEGE FISHER CENTER: $16,500 · OtherBARD COLLEGE FISHER CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHISTORIC RED HOOK: $12,350 · OtherHISTORIC RED HOOKRED HOOK PUBLIC LIBRARY: $9,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH: $7,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $7,000 · OtherTHE FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Other+56 more: $80,853 · Other+56 moreWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC: $63,840 · EnvironmentWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INCNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDA…+7 more: $8,050 · Environment+7 moreHUDSON RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM: $24,500 · Arts & CultureHUDSON RIVER M…NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $16,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET PRES…NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HIST…ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS ASSOCI…FRIENDS OF CLERMONT INC: $2,250 · Arts & CultureTHE RED HOOK DAILY CATCH INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $4,525 · Arts & Culture+7 moreTABOR ACADEMY: $10,100 · EducationFlint Hill School: $7,810 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $7,800 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,600 · Education+3 more: $1,400 · EducationSUMMER SEARCH: $27,000 · EmploymentCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $20,000 · PhilanthropyRED HOOK RESPONDS INCORPORATED: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASCIENZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $1,002 · PhilanthropyDAMIANO OF DULUTH INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE BORDERS INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$181,953Environment$116,890Arts & Culture$57,275Education$33,710Employment$27,000Philanthropy$24,002Human Services$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC: $63,840 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM: $24,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHISTORIC RED HOOK: $12,350 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetTABOR ACADEMY: $10,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFlint Hill School: $7,810 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $7,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDAMIANO OF DULUTH INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWALTER REED SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $2,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $2,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CLERMONT INC: $2,250 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRED HOOK RESPONDS INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RED HOOK DAILY CATCH INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPARADISUS DEI INC: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE'S NEST FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $1,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $1,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMER SOCIETY OF PLANT TAXONOMISTS KATHRYN PICARD NMNH: $1,350 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUnited States Merchant Marine Academy Alumni Association and Foundation Inc: $1,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,010 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASCIENZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPHILL HUDSON INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON OPERA HOUSE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPSTATE FILMS LTD: $665 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION MID-AMERICA CHAPTER: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENOBSCOT MARINE MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION: $500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGivenGain Foundation USA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC RED HOOK ↗
  • Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Flint Hill School ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WALTER REED SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CLERMONT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sally S and Robert K Phelan Legacy Foundation IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sally S and Robert K Phelan Legacy Foundation Inc · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Ibm International Foundation · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health · Thomas Thompson Trust · The Ascienzo Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · The Thendara Foundation · Henry L Kimelman Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ellen and Samuel Phelan Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ellen and Samuel Phelan Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ellen and Samuel Phelan Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ellen and Samuel Phelan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellen and Samuel Phelan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph