· Private foundation
Elizabeth Streb Peroutka Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Heartbeat Intl | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MRMARYLAND RIGHT TO LIFE INC2× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +110%
- HIHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +57%
- DLDEFEND LIFE INC2× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- FFFoundation for Moral Lawone grant, 2017 · $43k
- CECornerstone Evagelical Free Churchone grant, 2017 · $30k
- UAUnited Against Povertyone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
24 hour pray service
A consortium of ministries dedicated to obtaining constitutional protection personhood for unborn children from the moment of conception.
To equip pro-life advocates to defend the dignity of life.
Education and information to promote life from birth to natural death
Educate the public about abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia and to support positive alternatives to abortion.
The mission of the bella womens centr is to demonstrate the compassion of jesus christ and provide pregnancy-related services that support life for both mother and child.
To be a community based ministry of jesus christ committed to serve, to inform, encourage and assist women and men in word and deed, empowering them to make life affirming decisions for themselves and their families
Preservation of human life.
Life Training Institute's (LTI) purpose is to teach and train students and adults to save lives by persuasively communicating the pro-life position. LTI accomplishes this by deploying a team of speakers, all highly trained, to go and…
To educate the public about abortion
To foster a Christ-like view of human life and sexuality by offering hope and compassionate help to women experiencing an unplanned pregnancy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Right to Life Inc and the most unlike its peers is Benedictine Society of Baltimore City Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Institute on the Constitution Inc ↗
- Who funds LIVING WATERS FOR CHRIST INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND RIGHT TO LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARY'S HOME MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds DEFEND LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Home for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor ↗
- Who funds BENEDICTINE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE CITY INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elizabeth Streb Peroutka Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elizabeth Streb Peroutka Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Streb Peroutka Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.