Skip to content
Elizabeth H Freeman Tr Uw at a glance

· Private foundation

Elizabeth H Freeman Tr Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$487
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$12kReligion$5kEducation$3kHealth$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPhilanthropy$1kHuman Services$1kYouth Development$825
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$203
Median grant
11
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OXFAM AMERICA INC$487
OUR LITTLE BROTHERS & SISTERS$406
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$406
SALESIAN MISSIONS$284
MISSIONHURST-CICM$284
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$203
SOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATION$203
RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC$203
THE GRANT FOUNDATION$203
NAVAJO HEALTH FDSAGE MEM HOSPITAL$203
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$203
DOOLEY FOUNDATIONINTERMED INC$162
THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$162
AMERICAN RED CROSS$162
DAVID LIVINGSTONE MISSIONARY FDN$162
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $563 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $557 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $485 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $168 → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $168 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $162 → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $162 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
SD
PA
CA
WV
VA
AZ
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$28k
$0

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +38%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +27%
  • OL
    OUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +331%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    6/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    OUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC: $2,007 · OtherOUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INCSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $1,983 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INCMISSIONHURST INC: $1,983 · OtherMISSIONHURST INCNAVAJO HEALTH FDSAGE MEM HOSPITAL: $1,416 · OtherNAVAJO HEALTH FDSAGE MEM HOSPITALST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $1,416 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOLSOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATION: $1,416 · OtherSOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATIONRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $1,416 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLDOOLEY FOUNDATIONINTERMED INC: $1,133 · OtherDOOLEY FOUNDATIONINTERMED INCDAVID LIVINGSTONE MISSIONARY FDN: $1,133 · OtherDAVID LIVINGSTONE MISSIONARY FDNTHE SALVATION ARMY: $1,133 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYOUR LITTLE BROTHERS & SISTERS: $825 · OtherOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,398 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,832 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $1,416 · InternationalGRANT FOUNDATION INCHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,416 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,133 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEAL…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,265 · Human ServicesAmerican …
    Other$15,861International$10,195Human Services$2,265

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,398 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,832 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,265 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC: $2,007 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $1,416 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,416 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,133 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
    • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds OUR LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS INC ↗
    • Who funds GRANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
    • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
    Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Elizabeth H Freeman Tr Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth H Freeman Tr Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elizabeth H Freeman Tr Uw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home