Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elisabeth D Wagner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$86kEducation$63kHuman Services$60kHealth$58kYouth Development$28kFood & Nutrition$26kScience & Tech$24kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON HOUSE$4,000
SALVATION ARMY ANGEL TREE$4,000
SAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HS$3,100
COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN CLINIC$3,000
FIRST STEP INC$2,500
MIRACLE LEAGUE$2,500
ARTCHURCH STUDIO EMERGENT ARTS$2,500
MID AMERICA SCIENCE MUSEUM FND$2,500
NATL PARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FND$2,500
THE CALL GARLANDHOT SPRING CO$2,500
COOPER ANTHONY CHILD ADVOCACY$2,500
TRI-LAKES CASA PROGRAM$2,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB SALINE CO$2,000
IMAGINATION LIBRARY$2,000
AR SCHOOL MATHMATICS SCIENCES ARTS$1,995
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HOT SPRINGS: $3k → 17%SAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HOT SPRINGS: $3k → 17%SAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HS INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 42 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
32

Total granted

$345k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+4%

Still filing today

29%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HOT SPRINGS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +13%
  • MA
    MID AMERICA SCIENCE MUSEUM
    6× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +46%
  • TM
    The Muses Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHRISTIANS MINISTRIES COOP CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF SALINE CNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • MA
    MID AMERICA SCIENCE MUSEUM FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ozark Heritage Arts Center

Provide access and education emphasizing arts and cultural programs for the people of North central Arkansas and to the art gallery & museum visitors while also preserving the rich history and culture of the Ozark Mountain Region-North…

Arts & Culture
2
Grand Prairie Art Council Inc

Promote the arts in the grand prairie region of arkansas

Arts & Culture
3
The Friends of the Garland County Library of Hotsprings Arkansas Inc

Donate funds to garland county library to enable them to purchase books, reading devices, and software equipment, and to fund children and adult reading programs, special events, and outreach programs.

—
4
Northwest Arkansas Community Creative Center

To awaken the extraordinary power of art and engage individuals and the community through accessible art education.

Arts & Culture
5
Arkansas Country Doctor Museum

Operating a public museum

Arts & Culture
6
Arkansas Air and Military Museum

The mission of the Arkansas Air and Military Museum is to establish and maintain a museum for public display of aircraft, aviation artifacts, and military memorabilia from the earliest period to the present with special attention to items…

Arts & Culture
7
North Central Arkansas Foundation for the Arts and

Spreading art and art education

Arts & Culture
8
Ozark Living Newspaper Theatre

Theatre Company

—
9
Central Delta Historical Society

Museum

Education
10
Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History Inc

The Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History was established to help further the mission of the Division of Arkansas Heritage; to identify Arkansass Heritage and enhance the quality of life by the discovery,preservation and…

Arts & Culture
11
Arkansas Library Association

Awareness and use of arkansas public libraries

—
12
Arkansas Governor's Mansion Association

To raise funds through fundraisers and memberships to help support the upkeep and refurbishment of the arkansas governor's mansion

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arkansas Learning Through the Arts; the most unlike its peers is National Park College Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY ANGEL TREE: $28,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY ANGEL TREEMIRACLE LEAGUE: $21,500 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUEFIRST STEP INC: $21,000 · OtherFIRST STEP INCLEVI HOSPITAL: $15,500 · OtherCOOPER-ANTHONY MERCY CHILD ADVOCACY: $13,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES COOP CLINIC: $11,800 · OtherTRI-LAKES CASA PROGRAM: $11,500 · Other+65 more: $219,696 · Other+65 moreMID AMERICA SCIENCE MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMID AMERI…The Muses Inc: $10,500 · Arts & CultureThe Muses…Arkansas Learning Through the Arts: $5,500 · Arts & CultureArkansas …EMERGENT ARTS: $3,600 · Arts & CultureEMERGENT …POCKET THEATRE INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HOT SPRINGS: $21,750 · Human ServicesCOOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES & CLINIC: $9,000 · HealthOUR PROMISE CANCER RESOURCES: $1,000 · HealthGARLAND COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $4,000 · EducationGarland County CASA Program: $3,000 · Civil Rights
Other$342,496Arts & Culture$36,100Human Services$21,750Health$10,000Education$4,000Civil Rights$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HOT SPRINGS: $21,750 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST STEP INC: $21,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMID AMERICA SCIENCE MUSEUM: $15,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Muses Inc: $10,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCOOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES & CLINIC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHot Springs Area Cultural Alliance: $8,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetLiteracy Council of Garland County Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetHOT SPRINGS JAZZ SOCIETY: $6,500 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetGARLAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,800 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetArkansas Learning Through the Arts: $5,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGARLAND COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $4,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEMERGENT ARTS: $3,600 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOCKET THEATRE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUR PROMISE CANCER RESOURCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF HOT SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP INC ↗
  • Who funds MID AMERICA SCIENCE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds The Muses Inc ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES & CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Hot Springs Area Cultural Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Council of Garland County Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOT SPRINGS JAZZ SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GARLAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Arkansas Learning Through the Arts ↗
  • Who funds GARLAND COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENT ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR40.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Morris Foundation Inc · Munro Foundation · Chi St Vincent Hospital Hot Springs (Fka Mercy Hospital Hot Springs) · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elisabeth D Wagner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elisabeth D Wagner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elisabeth D Wagner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Elisabeth D Wagner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elisabeth D Wagner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph