Skip to content
Elim Care Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Elim Care Foundation

To hold and invest non-operating investments of the elim care family of corporations.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$8.7MHealth$160k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $370k
  • $250k+2 grants · $950k
$210,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWTON VILLAGE INC$700,000
VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING INC$250,000
EVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOUSE INC$210,000
HAVEN HOMES INC$160,000
ELIM CHILDREN'S CENTER$34,421
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $642k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CASSIA SERVICES: $357k → 11%PIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING: $285k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elim Senior Housing Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
2
Redeemer Residence Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
3
Elim Care Foundation

To hold and invest non-operating investments of the elim care family of corporations.

—
4
Augustana Home of Hastings

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Health
5
Augustana Care

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Unclassified
6
Baptist Home Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Health
7
Elim Care Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
8
Park View Care Center

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
9
Augustana Health Care Center of Apple Valley

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
10
Country Meadow of Milaca Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
11
Park Terrace Assisted Living Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
12
Brookside Senior Living

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elim Homes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cassia Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASSIA: $3,649,935 · ReligionCASSIAEVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $1,378,200 · OtherEVANGELICAL RETIREM…ELIM HOMES INC: $136,500 · OtherELIM HOMES INC+1 more: $20,000 · OtherNEWTON VILLAGE INC: $1,205,000 · Housing & ShelterNEWTON VILLAGE INCVILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterVILLAGE ASSISTED L…NEW HARMONY CARE CENTER INC: $1,351,105 · PhilanthropyNEW HARMONY CARE …CASSIA SERVICES: $357,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $285,000 · Human ServicesHAVEN HOMES INC: $160,000 · HealthELIM CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $34,421 · Education
Religion$3,649,935Other$1,534,700Housing & Shelter$1,455,000Philanthropy$1,351,105Human Services$642,000Health$160,000Education$34,421

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASSIA: $3,649,935 over 1y, 54% of budgetEVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $1,378,200 over 2y, 11% of budgetNEW HARMONY CARE CENTER INC: $1,351,105 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEWTON VILLAGE INC: $1,205,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetCASSIA SERVICES: $357,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $285,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetVILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $250,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetHAVEN HOMES INC: $160,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetELIM HOMES INC: $136,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetELIM CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $34,421 over 1y, 14% of budgetELIM SHORES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Elim Homes Inc
Elim Homes IncMN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elim Homes Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elim Care Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elim Care Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elim Care Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Elim Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elim Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home