Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Breedlove Foundation Im 020120186528

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202022.

Health$840kYouth Development$810kHuman Services$650kArts & Culture$323kRecreation & Sports$85kReligion$60kHousing & Shelter$37kFood & Nutrition$35kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITERARY COUNCIL OF NORTHERN VA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $717k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $560k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $45k → 10%MEMORY MATTERS: $20k → 10%MEMORY MATTERS: $20k → 10%SECOND HELPINGS: $20k → 10%SECOND HELPINGS: $15k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $20k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $17k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$3.0M
$1k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $810k · revenue +9%
  • TV
    THE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $800k · revenue +52%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $605k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • LC
    LITERARY COUNCIL OF NORTHERN VA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coastal Family Vacation Foundation Inc
2
Darlington County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To provide affordable housing for low-income families in darlington county, sc

Housing & Shelter
3
Hospital Auxiliary

To render aid, assistance & comfort to the patients of hilton head hospital and coastal carolina hospital and to their families and friends through an in-service volunteer program, and to enrich the quality of life, health and education of…

4
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

5
Hilton Head Island Concours Delegance Inc

The concours event is held annually on hilton head island, sc and displays historical and significant automobiles for the purpose of educating the public on the automotive industry origin, development and contribution to history

Arts & Culture
6
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
7
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
8
Community Kitchen Inc of Myrtle Beach

The mission is to feed the hungry and eliminate hunger in our community. last year, we fed over 101,000 adults in our general feeding program and nourished 32,644 children in our childrens hunger initiative program (chip). every person who…

Food & Nutrition
9
Lowcountry Veterans Home

Lowcountry Veterans Home provides transitional housing and individualized support for homeless veterans, working to restore stability, dignity, and independence. Through case management, peer support, transportation, and strong community…

Health
10
Fostering Hope Inc

Provide facility, clothing and personal care items to numerous displaced children of Horry County. Create foster care awareness. Multiple organizations are visited monthly.

Human Services
11
Horry County Disabilities & Special Needs Board

To provide services to the mentally and physically challenged individual in Horry County and surrounding counties.

Human Services
12
Health Care Partners of South Carolina Inc

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hilton Head Heroes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC — $810,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INCTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC — $800,000 · OtherTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC+11 more — $368,000 · Other+11 moreTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $605,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INCMEMORY MATTERS — $40,000 · Human ServicesMEMORY MATTERSFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY — $36,800 · Human ServicesSECOND HELPINGS — $35,000 · Human ServicesARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA — $155,000 · Arts & CultureARTS CENT…COASTAL DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $110,000 · Arts & CultureCOASTAL D…HEROES ON HORSEBACK — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsHILTON HEAD HEROES INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEFUL HORIZONS — $20,000 · Religion
Other$1,978,000Human Services$716,800Arts & Culture$265,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Philanthropy$20,000Religion$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC — $810,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC — $800,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $605,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA — $155,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCOASTAL DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $110,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMOSS CREEK MARINES INC — $45,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetMEMORY MATTERS — $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY — $36,800 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS — $35,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHEROES ON HORSEBACK — $30,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetHILTON HEAD HEROES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetHOPEFUL HORIZONS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC
  • Who funds THE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA
  • Who funds COASTAL DISCOVERY MUSEUM
  • Who funds MOSS CREEK MARINES INC
  • Who funds MEMORY MATTERS
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS
  • Who funds HEROES ON HORSEBACK
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD HEROES INC
  • Who funds HOPEFUL HORIZONS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the LowcountrySC28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · The Bargain Box · Heritage Classic Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Berkeley Hall Charitable Foundation · Wexford Foundation · David W Ellis Family Foundation · The Church Mouse Thrift Shop Inc · Ekedahl Foundation · Rotary Club of Hilton Head Island-Sunset · The Gleason Family Foundation Inc · Palmetto Electric Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Breedlove Foundation Im 020120186528 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph