Skip to content

· Public charity

Electrical Workers Local #369 Ibew

To organize all workers in the entire electrical industry in the united states and canada, including all those in public utilities and electrical manufacturing, into local unions,to promote reasonable methods of work, to cultivate feelings of friendship amoung those of our industry, to settle all disputes between employers and employees…

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $1,682,122, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,796,054 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $113,932 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $221k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $370k
$45,570
Median grant
—
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IBEW PAC$370,000
Individual grant recipient$212,095
Individual grant recipient$207,923
Individual grant recipient$144,788
Individual grant recipient$120,138
Individual grant recipient$114,199
BROADWAY ELECTRIC SERVICE$105,572
Individual grant recipient$100,781
SERVICE ELECTRIC INC$53,510
KENTUCKIANA ELECTRICAL SERVICES$46,118
HENDERSON SERVICES LLC$45,570
RED ROVER ELECTRIC LLC$27,780
Individual grant recipient$22,202
Individual grant recipient$18,706
GLICOD COMMUNICATIONS LLC$18,500
02Its field
02the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2024 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IBEW PAC: $370,000 · OtherIBEW PACIndividual grant recipient: $212,095 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $207,923 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $144,788 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $120,138 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $114,199 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBROADWAY ELECTRIC SERVICE: $105,572 · OtherBROADWAY ELECTRIC SERVICEIndividual grant recipient: $100,781 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+14 more: $306,626 · Other+14 more
Other$1,682,122

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

03Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Electrical Workers Local #369 Ibew?

Find your warmest path to Electrical Workers Local #369 Ibew through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Electrical Workers Local #369 Ibew’s filings →

More from the funding graph