Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eleanor Thornell Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$94kHuman Services$84kReligion$55kYouth Development$33kPublic Benefit$32kAnimals$28kArts & Culture$21kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
HOPE CENTER$10,000
WOMAN'S CLUBHOUSE ASSOC OF NAV CO$7,500
DIAMONDS AND RUBIES RANCH$5,000
WAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS CENTER$5,000
NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSO$5,000
CAMP OF THE RISING SUN$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL$5,000
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
JAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
CORSICANA NAVARRO CO PUBLIC HEALTH$5,000
VOICE$4,000
COMPASSION CORSICANA$2,500
CISD PENGUIN PROJECT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $5k → 14%NAVARRO VICTIMS CENTER: $10k → 23%CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 23%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $15k → 23%CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13k → 23%HOPE CENTER: $13k → 23%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHUCH CORSIC: $13k → 23%JAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $11k → 23%CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%VOICE: $10k → 23%CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%JAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 23%VOICE: $10k → 23%HOPE CENTER: $10k → 23%HOPE CENTER: $10k → 23%THE SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 23%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHUCH CORSIC: $10k → 23%THE SALVATION ARMY: $8k → 23%WAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS CENTER: $8k → 23%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHUCH CORSIC: $8k → 23%WOMAN'S CLUBHOUSE ASSOC OF NAV CO: $8k → 23%THE INN RECOVERY COMMUNITY: $8k → 23%CITY OF CORSICANA: $8k → 23%HOPE CENTER: $7k → 23%HOPE CENTER: $5k → 23%WAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS CENTER: $5k → 23%WAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS CENTER: $5k → 23%FIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 23%DIAMONDS AND RUBIES RANCH: $5k → 23%CORSICANA NAVARRO CO PUBLIC HEALTH: $5k → 23%VOICE: $5k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 23%NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSO: $5k → 23%JAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 23%DIAMONDS AND RUBIES RANCH: $5k → 23%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHUCH CORSIC: $5k → 23%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 23%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 23%VOICE: $4k → 23%FRIENDS OF THE CORSICANA PUBLIC LIB: $3k → 23%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $3k → 23%CISD PENGUIN PROJECT: $3k → 23%CISD PENGUIN PROJECT: $3k → 23%CISD PENGUIN PROJECT: $3k → 23%SAM HOUSTON PTO: $3k → 23%CITY OF RICE: $3k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 12 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$325k
$55k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +16%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +98%
  • CO
    CAMP OF THE RISING SUN
    4× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NAVARRO COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • NV
    NAVARRO VICTIMS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TI
    THE INN RECOVERY COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE CENTER INC: $46,000 · OtherHOPE CENTER INCFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHUCH CORSIC: $35,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHUCH CORSICVOICE: $29,000 · OtherVOICETHE SALVATION ARMY: $28,030 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYJAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25,500 · OtherJAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOLWAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS CENTER: $18,000 · OtherWAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS CENTERBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherCISD PENGUIN PROJECT: $11,000 · OtherNAVARRO VICTIMS CENTER: $10,000 · OtherDIAMONDS AND RUBIES RANCH: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $61,455 · Other+13 moreCORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $68,000 · EducationCORSICANA ISD EDUCA…HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $27,500 · AnimalsCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$288,985Education$68,000Animals$27,500Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $68,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $27,500 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $20,000 over 4y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OF THE RISING SUN ↗
  • Who funds WOMANS CLUB HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF NAVARRO COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pearl Thornell Charitable FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pearl Thornell Charitable Foundation · Navarro Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eleanor Thornell Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eleanor Thornell Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eleanor Thornell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph