Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eida Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it funds
0151% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$147kHuman Services$17kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$3kEducation$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$117,439
Median grant
1
States reached
$479k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
various$117,439
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CHILDRENS BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM: $360 → 17%OSTAR FAMILY SERVICES: $501 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 9 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
46

Total granted

$478k
$137k

Still filing today

0%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationPublic Safety & DisasterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    various
    6× · 2019–2024 · $356k
  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID
    2× · 2019–2020 · $41k
  • R
    Renewal
    3× · 2019–2023 · $35k

Funded once

  • AV
    AHABA VE AHAVA CONG
    one grant, 2023 · $34k
  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH
    one grant, 2017 · $21k
  • YO
    YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Friends of Zichron Meir Inc Friends of Zichron Meir

To support talmud torah zichron meir, a school in israel

Philanthropy
3
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
5
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
6
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
7
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
8
Cheder Menachem Inc

Education

Education
9
Bet Midrash Ohel Torah

Operation of a post-secondary educational institution providing rabbinical training with a focus on sephardic/middle eastern jewish tradition.

Education
10
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
11
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
12
Ohel Avraham

Support for jewish educational programs

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

various: $356,287 · OthervariousMAGEN DAVID: $41,301 · OtherMAGEN DAVIDRenewal: $35,000 · OtherRenewalAHABA VE AHAVA CONG: $34,450 · OtherAHABA VE AHAVA CONGMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $20,500 · Other+41 more: $117,298 · Other+41 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $201 · InternationalBonei Olam Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesOtsar Family Services Inc: $501 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $360 · Human ServicesHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $860 · ReligionILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $301 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $200 · Education
Other$604,836International$5,201Human Services$2,361Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Religion$860Education$501

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $860 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOtsar Family Services Inc: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $301 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds GESHER YEHUDA INC ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Otsar Family Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · Ronald and Lillie Ades Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eida Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eida Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eida Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph