Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ehlers-Danlos Society

The EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY is a global organization dedicated to advancing and accelerating research and education in ehlers-danlos syndromes (eds) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (hsd).

$7.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$848k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$3.2MScience & Tech$2.1MEducation$199k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $2,796,144 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,974,640 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,178,496 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.7M
$316,727
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$847,953
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$603,897
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION$382,692
CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL$316,727
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL$296,286
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$288,476
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$60,113
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE BROAD INSTITUTE: $767k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $383k → 16%THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 12%THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $604k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $332k → 8%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $200k → 12%CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL: $200k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $63k → 13%RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL: $296k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $848k → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $288k → 16%CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL: $317k → 19%REPROCELL USA INC: $12k → 11%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $159k → 16%THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $200k → 7%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $150k → 12%CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL: $85k → 19%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $134k → 16%CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL: $76k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
IN
PA
RI
CA
CO
MO
MD
NC
SC

Grants abroad, by region — $4.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

United Kindgom$3.0M · 72% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT · OPERATING EXPENSES

Switzerland$300k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$300k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

Netherlands$297k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

France$270k · 6% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 4 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    3× · 2022–2025 · $675k · revenue +27%
  • TC
    THE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $478k · revenue +22%
  • MU
    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $350k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • TB
    The Broad Institute Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $767k · revenue -19%
  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +34%
  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
11
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health
12
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical University of South Carolina Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Rhode Island Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Broad Institute Inc — $766,545 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncChildren's Hospital Corporation — $674,830 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationTHE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL — $477,561 · HealthTHE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITALMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $350,000 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATIONRhode Island Hospital — $296,286 · HealthRhode Island HospitalIndiana University Health Foundation Inc — $288,476 · HealthIndiana University Health Foundation IncThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $200,000 · HealthThe Children's Mercy HospitalTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,135,964 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF T…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $847,953 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $109,541 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVE…The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — $63,000 · Other+1 more — $12,275 · Other
Health$3,053,698Education$1,285,964Other$1,182,769

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,135,964 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $766,545 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $674,830 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL — $477,561 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

American Cancer Society IncGA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ehlers-Danlos Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • The Broad Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ehlers-Danlos Society?

Find your warmest path to Ehlers-Danlos Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph