Loading…
· Private foundation
EH BARNARD CHARITABLE TRUST
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$211k
Granted FY2025
7
Grants
1
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of EH BARNARD CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2025 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $161k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- YADKIN CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$50,000
- MAGNIFY MINISTRIES$45,000
- SHARE A HOME OF YADKIN COUNTY$25,000
- NEW HORIZONS ADULT DAY SERVICES INC$25,000
- YADKIN FAMILY YMCA$25,000
- ECHO MINISTRY INC - THE ARK$25,000
- HANDS OF HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC$15,500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
9
Total granted
$1.4M
$96k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-22%
+171%
Still filing today
50%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesReligionHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMAGNIFY MINISTRIES7× · 2019–2025 · $320k · revenue -33% · 48% of their budget
- YCYADKIN CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES7× · 2019–2025 · $295k
- YFYADKIN FAMILY YMCA7× · 2019–2025 · $269k
Funded once
- YCYADKIN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATIONone grant, 2021 · $30k
- HOHOPE OF WINSTON SALEM INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +79%
- FMFORBUSH MUSIC BOOSTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +171%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Yadkin Arts Council Inc
The exempt purpose of Yadkin Arts Council, Inc. is to coordinate and develop the cultural resources in Yadkin County in connection with the arts and to enrich lives through the arts.
—
2
Hope in Christ Counseling Inc
Providing funding for Christian Counseling in Marion NC
Religion
3
Hope Clinic
Hope clinic is a private, non-profit organization in pamlico county, nc that provides free medical and dental care to low-income, uninsured adults. we provide basic health care, prescription medications, laboratory tests, medical supplies,…
Health
4
Church Women United
Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…
—
5
Hope House of Cocke County
Food pantry
Human Services
6
William Hawkins Youth Ministries
Serves at-risk youth by teaching life skills, healthy eating habits and physical fitness. We provide service to the youth 3 days per week, 2 hours per day. We provide weekly year-round programs for youth.
Youth Development
7
Fresh Start Alamance Inc
Charitable nonprofit providing assistance to individuals in need in Alamance County
Housing & Shelter
8
Hope Shop
Provide food and necessities to those in need.
Food & Nutrition
9
City of Refuge - South Hill Inc
Our program is designed to help give back to the Southern Virginia community. We have weekly programs in place geared towards youth, young adults, families and senior citizens. We reach these individuals through feeding and group meetings…
Human Services
10
Only Hope Wnc
Serving the Homeless Youth of WNC
Human Services
11
Matthew 25 Ministries
The mission of matthew 25 ministries is to provide physical and spiritual aid to the needy in iredell county, nc.
Human Services
12
County Outreach Ministries
Provide service to underpriviledged
Religion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Horizons Adult Day Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Forbush Music Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,114,300Religion$320,000Health$75,000Human Services$30,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Education$12,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
North Carolina Community FoundationNC13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EH BARNARD CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: YADKIN COUNTY UNITED FUND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 561833370 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on YADKIN COUNTY UNITED FUND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 86% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Eh Barnard Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Eh Barnard Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines