Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Egyptian Area Agency on Aging Inc

Program services for the elderly

$4.2M
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$792k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Human Services$18MHealth$1.3MEducation$238kOther$0
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $3,456,901 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,182,819 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $725,918 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $455k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.9M
$219,110
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM$792,470
WILLIAMSON CO PROG ON AGING$573,853
GOLDEN CIRCLE SENIOR CITIZENS$471,843
SENIOR ADULT SERVICES$427,637
FRANKLIN COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES$370,015
SHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICES$289,062
THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY CO$219,110
SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM$70,031
FRANKLIN COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES$56,261
SIU AT CARBONDALE-LEGAL$55,491
GOLDEN CIRCLE SENIOR CITIZENS$54,162
SENIOR ADULT SERVICES$43,631
WILLIAMSON CO PROG ON AGING$18,854
THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY CO$14,481
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $12.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%NEPA CIL: $945k → 13%WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAM ON AGING: $803k → 13%THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTY: $318k → 15%SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM: $1.0M → 16%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $665k → 23%NEPA CIL: $841k → 13%WILLIAMSON CO PROG ON AGING: $574k → 13%THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY CO: $219k → 15%SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM: $792k → 16%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $428k → 23%NE PA CIL: $144k → 13%WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAM ON AGING: $531k → 13%THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTY: $195k → 15%SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM: $744k → 16%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $384k → 23%WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAM ON AGING: $518k → 13%THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTY: $189k → 15%SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM: $706k → 16%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $374k → 23%WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAM ON AGING: $488k → 13%THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COU: $170k → 15%SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM: $650k → 16%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $345k → 23%WILLIAMSON CO PROG ON AGING: $19k → 13%THE GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY CO: $14k → 15%SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAM: $70k → 16%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $44k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 10 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$18M
$1.2M

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAMS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +10% · 83% of their budget
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +14% · 27% of their budget
  • GC
    Golden Circle Senior Citizens Council
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • A
    ARIS
    one grant, 2020 · $706k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $532k
  • AO
    ALL OTHERS 5000
    one grant, 2017 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

2
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
3
Harrison County Commission On Aging Inc

Promote participation of all citizens in health, welfare, recreational, civic cultural and education agencies and organizations of the senior citizens of the harrison county commission on aging by acting as coorinators and grantee to…

Human Services
4
Albert Gallatin Human Service Agency Inc

Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.

Human Services
5
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
6
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
7
Washington County Senior Services Inc

To provide congregate meals, home delivered meals, transportation, and information and assistance to senior citizens of washington county, illinois.

8
Senior Citizens of Fulton County Inc

Provide meals & services to senior citizens

Human Services
9
Fayette County Commission On Aging Incorporated

The fayette county commission on aging serves and represents those adults 60 years of age and older in fayette county. the emphasis is on improving the quality of life of those fayette county citizens, 60 and above, and providing the…

10
Newberry County Council On Aging

Provision of various services for the elderly and transportation services for the citizens of newberry county.

Human Services
11
Franklin County Senior Citizens Inc

To keep senior citizens in their own home by providing meals, transportation, housework, yardwork, activities, health clinics, entertainment, referrals, and so forth for them.

Human Services
12
Highlands Senior Service Centerinc

To provide nutrition programs (including meals) on site and home delivery, health education, information and referral outreach, in home registery services, employment and volunteer placement for senior citizens.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Adult Services and the most unlike its peers is Northeast Pennsylvania Center for Independent Living. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAMS INC — $4,011,827 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAMS INCWILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING — $2,932,578 · Human ServicesWILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGINGSENIOR ADULT SERVICES — $2,240,538 · Human ServicesSENIOR ADULT SERVICESNORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING — $1,929,638 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGGOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTY — $1,105,569 · Human ServicesGOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTYGolden Circle Senior Citizens Council — $2,395,637 · OtherGolden Circle Senior Citizens Cou…Franklin County Senior Services Inc — $1,858,164 · OtherFranklin County Senior Services I…ARIS — $705,529 · OtherARISIndividual grant recipient — $532,009 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALE — $238,066 · Other+2 more — $37,182 · OtherSHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVEL CORP — $1,309,469 · Health
Human Services$12,220,150Other$5,766,587Health$1,309,469

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAMS INC — $4,011,827 over 8y, 83% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING — $2,932,578 over 8y, 27% of budgetGolden Circle Senior Citizens Council — $2,395,637 over 8y, 23% of budgetSENIOR ADULT SERVICES — $2,240,538 over 8y, 59% of budgetNORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING — $1,929,638 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFranklin County Senior Services Inc — $1,858,164 over 8y, 85% of budgetSHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVEL CORP — $1,309,469 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetGOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTY — $1,105,569 over 8y, 35% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN PRIDE SENIOR PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING
  • Who funds Golden Circle Senior Citizens Council
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULT SERVICES
  • Who funds NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING
  • Who funds Franklin County Senior Services Inc
  • Who funds SHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVEL CORP
  • Who funds GOLD PLATE PROGRAM OF PERRY COUNTY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Egyptian Area Agency on Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $6.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph